http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/ar ticles/nvidia-geforce-gt

Basically what happened is that they stopped the M series and simply put in the same graphics cards with lower clocked cores but to compensate they added more cores. Gaming laptops might be finally decent now. Cooling is still a big problem though but otherwise the cards perform as good as their desktop counterparts. Without throttling the 1060 and 1070 should capable of destroying the 980m.

I'm wondering if we're going to see eGPUs integrated in a custom chassis with dedicated cooling in the future for non gaming laptops that have Thunderbolt 3 ports. There was a proof of concept with a 960m.

The jump from 28nm to 14nm was massive. I'm wondering what's going to happen from 14nm to 7nm.

>>56106753
>Gaming laptops might be finally decent now
Every single time, without fail. Maxwell didn't help, what makes you think this will?

File: 1464204649589.png (40KB, 152x254px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 152x254px

>>56106831
this makes me hard

>>56106885
nvidia stayed at 28nm for like three entire generations now they are at 16nm

hahahaHAHAHA THANKS BASED NVIDIA

AMD BTFO AND IS BANKRUPT AND FINISHED

>>56106993
Because die shrinks have helped so much in the past, right? Nvidia laptop idiots are almost as bad as the AMD fanboys
>It'll be different this time!
>THIS one will give longer battery life and run cooler!
Meanwhile the 980m was a 130 watt abomination and the 1080 will be no different. The 100 watt TDP bracket, which previously the best, is now just the x70m

>>56107025
I didn't say it will run cooler or have more battery life. I said with adequate cooling and it being connected to the grid it will perform about as good as the desktop cards. If you care about battery life you should stick with intel's integrated GPU as always.

File: image.jpg (93KB, 500x749px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 500x749px

>>56106831
>mfw the laptop part is even slightly faster stock

>>56107095
gddr4 tho

>>56107099
it's lightning fast though

>>56107095
wasnt this confirmed fake?

>>56107108
no or else you'd need a thunderbolt connector to display to the monitor

it's gotta be slow..

>>56107114
excuse me are you not seeing the 24 pci-i 8pin connectors on the side

>>56107124
haha no i didn't even notice thx for pointing it out

>>56107133
pci-e* my bad
at first i thought it was metal vented sides too

>>56107124
You're right it must be fake, AMD would go for 6-pins.

>>56107048
>will perform about as good as the desktop cards
Bwahaha no. That'll never happen. Even the desktop 980 that was shoved into laptops still didn't perform as well as the actual 980.

File: image.png (141KB, 502x502px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 502x502px

>>56107212
Still performed better than anything AMD has to offer and now these will absolutely fuck AMD. Amd mobile graphics are disaster on so many level it makes their desktop gpu drivers look flawless.

>>56107243
That has nothing to do with anything, all dedicated laptop GPUs are shit. Your poor attempt at trying to make it an AMD v nvidia issue is laughable.

>>56107262
My 980M gtx on old laptop ran oretty much every high end game with 60 fps. Battlefield 4 at over 90 fps. Not all dedicated laptop gpus are shit. Your parents who made you are shit.

File: DSC08947-980x653.jpg (93KB, 980x653px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 980x653px

>>56107291
This one here is faster than your laptop

>>56107461
>>56107291
can you fags stop arguing please

>>56107499
checked

>>56106753
>gaming
>laptop
>>>/v/ you manchild

What is price range?

1080 for ~1k usd notebooks?

or whole segment is going higher?

>>56104668
So how good are these compare to their desktop variant?

>>56104668
>mfw these will cost even more than the desktop versions because muh power
oh well at least they are finally pulling their finger out in the mobile space
>>56106768
>1/2 or better power consumption per clock/whatever
>???
Wont be seeing that till 2021+ at least since 14nm finfet is barely stable

maybe a small jump down to 12-10nm?

>>56106831
>laptop 1080 outperforms it's desktop cousin
How the actual fuck

>>56108712

they're aiming at around at least 90 per cent, real life taste confirm it' at least 85

Never thought I'd live to see the day when laptop GPUs perform so damn close to their desktop counterparts

>>56109291
Kek 1080 sli on laptop already faster than many PC dekstop. Checkout notebook check fps for gayming is jawdropping for a leltop.

>>56108686

i'm guessing around 1500 for the 1060. gotta wait till more oem settle on prices though, but it's still a shitty investment nonetheless

So how long until these are available? I bought a laptop with a 970m last night but just returned it because it was having issues and I heard the 10 series laptops are going to be coming out relatively soon.

>>56110686

press release said "few days"
MSI and Origin ones are already up for ordering

Asus and rest have yet to announce their machines

>>56106831
Were they using nitrogen to achieve these results?

So, 1050 mobile when? I'm not poor but I'm a student and I can only afford a 600-700 eurobucks laptop. Otherwise I'd just build another desktop. I can't justify spending more money on non-necessary shit that will drain my free time in the next years.

I'm guessing 2-3 months? I'd like to upgrade on black friday. I feel like my 5 years old, screenbroken i5 480\5650hd laptop is slowly abandoning me

Video games are important

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?item=N82E16814127964
Should I get it?