does learning Haskell make you a better programmer in terms of

>>56097731
No.

Haskell is for hobbyists who want to explore better / alternative programming.
Haskell isn't necessarily either of those, but it's a place to start exploring alternative languages.

This will most likely not change your market value.
If it does, it will decrease it.

>>56097731
I have never seen a job offer where Haskell or any other functional language was mentioned. Not even once.

>gold level Haskell certification
>any programming I want
>60k CAD starting

>>56097731
No.

Learn Lisp instead. It also does jack shit for your market value, but it's a better designed and implemented functional paradigm language.
And there's the very, very slim chance that it might help you get a job that involves legacy code or interpreters or some shit.

>>56097731
No
If there is a meme language it's haskell

>>56097731
Maybe, many claims that learning a functional programming language makes them think different and write better code. For me, learning haskell was a waste of time. If you want to learn functional programming there is way more useful languages out there - nodeJS for example

>>56100312
Tell me this is bait

File: that was bait.png (93KB, 1198x1200px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 1198x1200px

>>56100508