Why can't open source make a perfect torrent client like

>>56090257
No profit motive. No talent.

>>56090257
No one autistic enough has made it their goal yet

Libtorrent is trash

QB devs are fucking fags that are more into bloating the torrent than fixing 3 years old know as fuck bugs

No serious programmer works for free

FOSS is a fucking meme for NEETs and people with too much free time

>>56090739
the client*

what's wrong with qbittorrent?

>>56090865
Everything if you don't use it for casual leeching on public trackers

>>56090257
Who's "open source"?

>>56090875
I was curious too, too bad you couldn't provide real criticism.

>>56090257
What would the main draws of a perfect open source torrent client be?

In other words, what made uTorrent so good?

No one ever provides reasons why current ones are bad

File: 1451527008249.jpg (136KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1024x1024px

>>56090955
It's not exactly like the one I'm used to

>>56090920
0 issues

>>56090739
>Libtorrent is trash
There are two different libtorrent.

>>56091031
What specific issues do you have with clients other than microTorrent?

>>56090257
>It can't be so hard
Make the torrent client you want. You're a NEET with endless free time after all.

>>56090257
Why don't you fork an open source client and fix it yourself?
It can't be so hard

>>56090257
Deluge?

>>56090955
They just don't feel right.

>>56091128
>even thinking about using a torrent client know for reseting torrents and getting people banned from private trackers

>>56091183
>getting people banned from private trackers
I've been seeding with Deluge on over 12 private trackers for years. Zero problems.

>>56091183
You're thinking of the wrong one, Deluge is the one that's just fine.

It's utorrent that's banned.

>>56091215
>works on my machine :^)

>>56091215
I've been using ecstasy for 12 years without problems, that doesn't mean I recommend it.

>>56091174
>>56091025
Why are we even wasting time with this thread?
Technology impaired wintards who use their computer to download porn and game of thrones are unable to get used to new software. Who the fuck cares?

Transmission is literally perfect

>>56091262
No, bitch I mean re-downloading stuff and fucking up the ratio

>>56091266
Machines. I seed with 2x Gigabit seedboxes and 1 home connection.

>>56090257
what's so great about µtorrent?
>windows only, so not viable for a seedbox
would be enough of a reason not to advocate it as the non plus ultra of torrent clients
then the fact that stuff like deluge or qbittorrent provide exactly the same functionality and interface and are stable enough for the occasional leech here or there

>>56091333
Enjoying your ransomware?

ITT: people too dumb to use aria2 and rtorrent

>>56091507
>not viable for a seedbox
Do you even home seedbox

>>56091573
leaving a windows computer running 24/7 is a waste of money when you could just use some cheap raspberry pi or similar and connect it to an external hdd

KTorrent is better

>>56091620
Because I have FTTH and 8 sata drives?

Explain how Qbittorrent is bad. I've never had problem with it

File: 1441523260437.png (1MB, 1499x2653px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1499x2653px

>>56090257
pic

>>56091530
wat

>>56091969
I love reading comparisons in that style. Do you have more pics like that(it doesn't have to be about Torrent clients.)?

File: 1444016039771.jpg (228KB, 700x1094px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 700x1094px

>>56092009

>>56092018
Fuck yeah, I'm cumming

File: 1444984327652.jpg (541KB, 2550x3300px) Image search: [Google]

541KB, 2550x3300px

>>56092060

File: 1374204089420.png (1MB, 1500x2670px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1500x2670px

>>56091969
this is outdated

>>56092090
Where do you find these? Is there a website for that?

>>56090257
What's the matter with Deluge?
It works flawlessly and I haven't updated it for a year.

>>56091549
fucking this. rtorrent is the BEST torrent client out there. its simply perfect. much better than fucking utorrent

>>56091507
>>windows only

Android (2.1 and later),[6] Linux (officially supported using Wine;[12] native server version also available[13]), Microsoft Windows, OS X (10.5; Intel and PPC)

I still use uTtorrent 2.2.1 because I'm used to it, it works for the most part and it has low RAM usage.

But I tried qBittorrent and it was alright. Why don't people like it?

>>56091969
Can we admit that we don't really know what 'bloat' means anymore? Tixati is an awful client but it is not bloated by any means.

>>56092233
>no UI
>no windows version
>no updates
Bitch please

>>56092416
But it does have a UI.

>>56092140
Do we even know who is this "4 chan" ?

>>56092233
>a client made for autists and fags that pay to pirate

Nope

>>56091031
Besides being slow as shit.

>>56091439
Lol get a load of this retard. Ratio problems, dial up user?
Also deluge doesn't redownload. It does sometimes hash check torrents on start up, but even if it did you should try upgrading from 56K.

File: 1471270425.png (61KB, 1920x955px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1920x955px

>>56092491
lol what? since when do people pay for pirating?

>>56092416
what is this ?

>>56092551
>webui
Kill yourself pls

>>56092568
kek so what? i have chrome open 24 7. its the same thing as if im running it as backgruodn process on my machine.

no its even better, it saves resources on my main machine

>>56091530
Free encryption

>>56090257
But it exists?

rtorrent+libtorrent

>>56090285
This. Why bother when the 'perfect' client already exists?

>>56091969
utorrent infographic irrelevant for 2.2.1
>qbit
>BETTER compatibility on windows compared to deluge
if anything it stalls instead, deluge's heavy af but nothing is stalling

guide doesnt apply well to windows apparently (every other client listed here worked flawlessly only on linux)

>>56092574
>i have chrome open 24 7
This is the power of freetards

>>56092703
>freetards
>chrome
are you even trying?

File: 1465753766411.png (95KB, 295x237px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 295x237px

>>56092703
what the fuck are you babbling holy shit are you stupid?

>>56091266
:^)

I use uTorrent 2.2.1 and qBittorrent (for private trackers exclusively) on Windows 10 (previous 7 SP1). About 2500 torrents in uT, about 20 in qB. uT uses about 100MB RAM, while qB uses about 70MB. RAM usage wouldn't normally be a problem, but I use the computer that I seed from as my main computer and only have 8GB RAM. Other than that, I haven't had a problem with either. I just add the torrent, it downloads, and then seeds. Have not had a problem with how "aggressively" it seeds, and am satisfied with the results.

On my dedicated server I use rTorrent+ruTorrent on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. Currently close to 2500 torrents. I am wary about adding too many torrents at once because adding too many will make rTorrent (not ruTorrent) crash. When I was using a seedbox provider (seedhost.eu), there was a hard limit to how many torrents I could add at once (20). I have not had this problem with uTorrent, however uTorrent of course pops up a dialog box that prompts you on where to save the torrent after you add it, and ruTorrent has a different method (dialog box that asks where to save torrent is the same as uploading a torrent). Using the command-line interface for rTorrent would be extremely unwieldy with the number of torrents I'm seeding. Additionally, the web UI (ruTorrent) is sluggish with so many torrents (the inital load of the web UI will prompt the "script not responding" dialog on Firefox). However, I enjoy the traffic tracking features of ruTorrent and am satisfied with the results.