>iphones cost less to make than zenfones yet sell for nearly double the price
think different ;)
>MacBook Pros cost less to make than ThinkPad Ps
>sell for nearly three times the price
>with worse hardware
>while being less durable
>>56022313
good artists copy, great artists steal
I'm as anti-apple as the next guy, but I think this boils down to the economies of scale at least as much as it boils down to Apple being chintzy.
>toughbooks cost as much to make as memebooks ant memepads yet sell for triple the price because it's okay
>>56021314
kys
>>56021314
Prices includes a non-utter-shit OS and updates for at least three years.
>I don't understand economics
>>56022574
>i don't understand consumerist overproduction
fixed ya :^)
>>56022606
I'm not the one complaining about prices :^)
"Apple is better because if i break it, they fix it for free"
Is what they believe until i tell them that they already paid for 2 or 3 laptops up front, and so did all of the other people who didnt break their laptops.
>cost less to make and are still undisputed champs in terms of performance
Then don't buy one
they're sold for a high price BECAUSE PEOPLE BUY THEM AT THIS PRICE
And then of course come to /g/ to complain about it.
>some products costs more to throw away than it is to buy them
>>56022640
>using the smiley with a carat nose
The good ol' Apple Tax. The same performance, double the price.
>>56021314
>iphone soc is developed specifically for this single device
>devs have to develop it, write drivers
>os is also developed only by apple for apples
>not to mention enormous marketing expenses to keep iphone icon of smartphones and symbol of first world status
>hurr why is it expensive silicon is cheap
>still thinking production costs are in any way relevant to the selling price
If they can sell an iPhone for $700 why would they sell it for less?