what lisp should I lern? I'm looking for something mature

File: lisp.jpg (38KB, 768x384px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 768x384px

>>55981836
Common Lisp

>>55981848
what about scheme, racket or clojure?

File: lisp cute traps.png (834KB, 1200x1080px) Image search: [Google]

834KB, 1200x1080px

>>55981940
The only lisp that is mature and for real world applications is common lisp

just start with scheme, learning one lisp dialect makes picking up another one trivial

>>55981998
I've heard of way more people working with Clojure these days than with CL. I'm sure CL is mature and whatever but being on the JVM goes a long way,

wait, so how fast is CL
what tier is it.
I hope it's not python tier.

>>55982089
Yeah sure if you can stomach the god awful syntax and it being a 9 year old meme language for hipsters

>>55981940
They are objectively inferior

>>55982211
On the other hand, CL is a 30 year old language for elitists

>>55981836
>I'm looking for something mature (lots of support, i. e has lots of libs and many resources)
>something I can use in the real world

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA

/thread

>>55982915
what's so funny?

OP I'm doing my SICP but plan to use CL for my projects

>>55982108
SBCL is fast

>>55983856
faster than haskell?

>>55981836

Chez Scheme.

It was commercial until some months ago, now it's free (on GitHub) and very mature and stable.

>>55984108
Why should I use that over gambit or chicken?
>Cygwin
DROPPED

>>55982089
I hope you like having the JVM vomit 50 frames worth of unreadable stack trace when something goes wrong