Why don't developers fucking bugtest properly before

What do you want them to do? 3D scan your environment and internally render a model of your surroundings on your piece of shit phone just to make sure that the dumbass monsters in your shitty tracking game show up on a correct surface?

Eat a dick

>>55966127
I'm not just talking about pic related. No man's sky came out needing a day one patch. That shit is unforgivable, but somehow is quite common.

>>55966089
Why to release the best, when mediocre sells better and cost less?

Also the 90:10 principle.

>>55966127
Stfu and grow a brain

>>55966089
Because it costs more than the actual development (in both time and money).
Also a bug free software is nearly impossible, especially consumer software is extremly hard because lots of users on lots of hardware with lots of environments who can do lots of shit.

>>55966089
Because dumbasses like you will buy it regardless of whether they do or not

give them one (1) good reason waste time on shit noone cares

>>55966089
Bug testing doesn't increase the sales and wastes money

You can always use that fucker Poettering's canned reply--"Works on my machine. Not a bug."

>>55966291
This.

Plus I'm pretty sure most idiots her on /g/ couldn't even program a bug free Conway's Game Of Life even if their gaming rig's life depended on it.

>>55966152

>he buys games in early access

hahahahahahaha cuck

>>55966127
yes?

>>55966089
>>implying normies care about this
Omg a nigglet in the bushes
>>Sorry Dorothy this is the real world

dayz would already be out.

>>55966535
I can't even program, so I'd be completely fucked