How come early microprocessors looked so cool and shway while

Why do you care what they look like?

Are you a woman?

>>55933930
This. They compute stuff and let you see porn. That's all that matters desu.

>>55933930
if having wide hips count as a one ~~~

>>55934034
You're not a woman, and you never will be.

>>55933940
>>55933930
They probably want a yellow/red skull-shaped CPU with ammo-shaped cooling fins and 'military grade' mounting clips.

File: C4004_(Intel)[2].jpg (38KB, 610x208px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 610x208px

Looks sexy af
Sad the machines that housed them looked utter shit

File: byebyeferrari.gif (2MB, 320x244px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x244px

>>55933930
>Why do you care what they look like?

>Are you a woman?

Superb burn.

People quickly realized that if the wires within is reduced, the power consumption is reduced.
This is why we want smaller chips.

People also realized that on a square chip, there can be more connections on the bottom than if you use all sides.

if there can be 8 pins on all sides, there can be 32 connections if you have them on the side, but 64 if you have them on the bottom.

And smd size components are easy to solder and easy to automatize if you need to.

>>55934147
/thread

File: C1701[1].jpg (647KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

647KB, 1024x768px

Pure sex

File: I-00026.jpg (53KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 640x480px

But modern prahcessahs are cool too!

File: 4Phase[1].jpg (474KB, 1428x1693px) Image search: [Google]

474KB, 1428x1693px

There must be someone out there with this fetish too

>>55934209
ohh my

>>55933930
By that logic, everyone in battlestation threads is a woman.... which I'm not disputing

>>55935520

What if you do not care but post a pic on request?

>>55934124
>implying the old intel kit computers weren't cool as fuck

File: cdc7600.jpg (277KB, 1024x775px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 1024x775px

>>55933917
end your life

>>55935654
hnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg

I don't care that that whole room has less computing power then my cellphone, I wanna use that fucking system. Truly we missed a great era.

>>55935840
>None of that glorious sound
Why bother posting this?

File: 39-9-73 CDC 6600.jpg (4MB, 3682x2291px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3682x2291px

>>55935766
> that whole room has less computing power then my cellphone
please don't trigger me, such statements really downplay Cray's genius, even if it is true nowadays even when taking other details into account like memory bandwidth

>>55935840
some day i'll use a teletype

File: 1470393509974.jpg (24KB, 411x382px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 411x382px

>>55935916

>>55937107
>punch hole programming without a reference design or a display
That's some hardcode coding right there

>>55937107

https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1470433419284.webm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvzsELxBCrI