https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews /NVIDIA/Titan_X_Pascal/

File: amd.png (42KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 653x726px

DELETE

>>55921014
Nobody cares about your shitty 4K (JUST) GPU. Also performance per watt is all Nvidia has at present. Performance per dollar is won by AMD.

>>55921014

>several hundred dollars for 6% higher relative performance to a GTX1080

What a great deal.

>>55921014
Per usual Titan X is not worth it.

GTX1080Ti will destroy it.

File: perfrel_3840_2160.png (33KB, 500x810px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 500x810px

>>55921056
Are you stupid or what?

File: 1470015094841.png (451KB, 492x611px) Image search: [Google]

451KB, 492x611px

>>55921034
Aren't you guys getting bored?

This has to be the most boring job in the world.

>>55921121

Wrong graph. My bad.

File: 87ace5ec14b0809cff9fa198e9c5d803cb1ebad871a0c9906f37afd26faaeaa7_large.jpg (93KB, 1024x575px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 1024x575px

I cri everitiem

>>55921109
Dont you mean HBM2 will destroy it within the next 3 month?

>>55921014
Nvidia's tech is just ridiculously better optimized than AMD.

AMD is so fucking shit compared to Nvidia it's unbelievable.

>>55921042
Imagine that. Another cut-price product from AMD because they don't have anything competitive in the high end?

>>55922692
You mean when Nvidia finally launches the P100? That's not a gaming card. Though I have to agree with you that I'm kind of let down that the Titan card didn't come with HBM2.

>>55922072
>comparing a mid range-low end gpu to a $1200 gpu
are you retarded or whats the deal

>>55924421
>Nvidia's tech is just ridiculously better optimized than AMD.
complete nonsense without context

>AMD is so fucking shit compared to Nvidia it's unbelievable.
keep thinking that buddy it wont stop the 480 from outselling the 1060

>>55924931
Nvidia tech is way more optmised and efficient than AMD.
Part of that is they don't use a hardware scheduler.
That's why the GTX480 was a house fire

>>55924632

Lol let down? That's what Nvidia does. Releasing a Shit card because amd goofed. NV doesn't have to release 1080ti for a while now.
1080ti will come when amd fury releases or 490 comes out and is on part with 1080.

And 490 won't come close to 1080 since amd keeps fucking up. But I'm still hoping since I'm never getting a nv card again.

File: perfrel_2560_1440.png (33KB, 500x810px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 500x810px

>2x LINEAR performance of 980 ti, not 980 ti SLI
>not even overclocked yet
>1080 ti will only cost $650

JUST

>>55926149
>NV doesn't have to release 1080ti for a while now.
Good. Hopefully that means they have some time to squeeze out a few more optimizations.

File: 1446675527273.jpg (9KB, 227x200px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 227x200px

>>55921014
>buy Titan X
>the 1080ti appears 3 months later
>Titan X deprecated and obsolete
NVIDIOT BTFO

>>55926190
>thinking that's a good thing
top cuck

File: jen.jpg (45KB, 770x474px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 770x474px

>>55926193
>Titan X target audience caring about money

>>55926201
Is that a caramel cube that I'm seeing?

>>55926190

They will. But the point is they probably already have it ready. We are stuck with a high En card costing 1200$ lol.

Its not Nvidia fault tho they are just doing what's best for their stock holders.

. It's amd and Nvidia slaves fault. Amd for not relesing a high end card and Nvidia drones for buying overpriced cards

>>55926296
only 10% of people buy high end and enthusiast cards

>>55926296
the card price are in the same range. people bought nvidia card because it's better.

>>55921014
>980 better than 980 Ti

Nice graph

>>55926378

Really? I felt like everyone and their mothera had 980ti and 290x

Seriously I know so many people with a 980ti it ain't even funny

File: tmp_12370-perfdollar_3840_2160-2112366775.png (31KB, 500x810px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 500x810px

>tfw expected at least one person to post perf/dollar

Come on, do I have to do it myself?

>>55926296
are you dumb? gtx 1070/gtx 1080 are high end cards, gtx 1060 is in between mid and high end

File: lovely fags.gif (974KB, 240x188px) Image search: [Google]

974KB, 240x188px

>>55927465
>tfw you got a Fury for not much more than a 480 recently

File: amd2.jpg (52KB, 568x612px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 568x612px

>>55921162
I wish I was paid to shitpost.

>>55924931
Just look at the graph. AMD's newest cards can't even compete with Nvidia's last gen.

AMD is seriously pathetic.

>>55928099
But then NVIDIA will have Volta

>>55928121
but then AMD will have something else to wait for

>>55928155
top kek

>>55928155
Seeing how they just invented fire, is it a round wheel?

>>55927465
>because the cards are dirt cheap it inflates this total for 5 fps

jesus christ these charts are stupid

File: 1310483412100.jpg (36KB, 413x395px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 413x395px

>>55921014
>r9 fury x below the 970

>>55924620
They don't need to at present as they are dominating the mid/low end.

>>55928273
It's a perf/watt chart you dumb nigger.

File: 1449472077089.png (205KB, 420x426px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 420x426px

>>55928467
>mid/low end
Just like your life, right anon?

>>55928467
>at present as they are dominating the mid/low end.
>dominating
With the launch of the 1060 a couple of weeks ago I find that hard to believe. Got a citation for that?

>>55928249

>in a thread about praising the perf/watt of the titan x, suddenly perf/price is a stupid comparison

This brings me back to fermi, when nvidiots spent their time claiming perf/watt charts were worthless.
Times have changed.

>>55928467
That's hilarious, the 1060 is by far the best midrange card and it's Nvidia

>>55928700
http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/directx/

Also don't forget a lot of RX 480's don't even see a Steam account due to coin mining. So it's likely to be higher.

>>55928862
>http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/directx/
The GTX 950 gained twice as much as the 480 did in the same time period. I thank you for providing proof that the 480 is not dominating the mid/low end market.

>>55928862
Uhh that shows that Nvidia is dominating the midrange...and the low end...and the high end.

>>55928862
Whoops. >>55928874 was in regards to Vulkan. DX12, the 970 and the 960 each outsold more than the 480 in July according to your citation. Outsold it by twice as much.

>>55928874
>>55928881
This includes before the RX 480 and GTX 1060 were launched retards. I don't give a fuck about the other cards. I am only showing that the RX 480 is beating the GTX 1060 at present. Yes I know the GTX 1060 was launched later than the RX 480. Stop trying to twist the fact that Nvidia dominates. I know they fucking do. But times are changing.

Vulkan Systems
RX 480 +0.12%
GTX 1060 +0.06%

DX12 Systems
RX 480 +0.05%
GTX 1060 +0.02%

DX11 Systems
RX 480 +0.06%
GTX 1060 +0.03%

>>55928913
Yeah well since the new GPU's are hard to source right now and more expensive because of varying factors like demand/scalping etc then yeah people will probably buy older GPU's because they are in stock when they need a new GPU. Basically it means jack shit.

>>55928924
>This includes before the RX 480 and GTX 1060 were launched retards.
That was specifically for only the month of July. If you want to consider "after launch" let's remind ourselves when was the launch day of the 1060? More than half the month of July had passed before the 1060 was launched?

And finally, what was actually claimed? "dominating the low/mid MARKET?"

>>55928913
One other thing. You forget that a lot of people rushed to upgrade to Windows 10 in July and had existing GTX 970's etc so now they can do DX12. That means the 970 gets a bump in DX12 even though no new 970's were purchased.

>>55928960
>Basically it means jack shit.
Basically it determines that Nvidia is leading the current mid/low end market.

>>55928976
Yes dominating the midrange/low market *NOW*. Not 6 months ago. *NOW*

>>55928983
And this is a different time frame than just looking at % change in July in comparison the 480?

>>55928986
No it just means you are living in the past and a glorified shill.

I am not replaying to anymore Nvidia shills thanks. The numbers speak for themselves.

>>55929030
>No it just means you are living in the past and a glorified shill.
You sir, are an idiot.
>The "market" only means two cards not the rest of the gpus sold on the market. . .

I expect you are the same retard who pointed out how the 480 outsold the 1060 in July as if that is something good. As if the 1060 didn't sell half the same amount as the 480 did in roughly a third of the time.

>In DX11 NVIDIA GeForce 920M and R9 380 are level pegging at +0.31%
kek

>>55929061
It is kind of strange to see a lot of mobile gpus gaining enormously.

>>55929056
Give it a couple of months and we will see who is right.

>>55929075
Are you an AMDoublestandards? That's the usual call of the AMDoublestandards, "wait, wait, and wait some more."

>>55929070
Lots of gamers on the go these days I guess. Why people are still buying 380's though is anyone's guess.

>>55929104
I'd guess they're buying them for the same reason people are still buying the 960/970. They need a new GPU but cannot wait/find an affordable 1060/480.

>>55929091
Well to be fair as I sated GTX 1060 was released about 6 weeks later so we need to give it a little time to get a better indication. If the GTX 1060 % rises in relation to the RX 480 (In that they do not rise on par with each other) it will be more telling. It's too early to call right now.

>>55929114
Yeah. That's my guess too. The 970 outsold both the 1060 and 480 so supply and cost of the new GPU's is obviously a factor here.

>>55928874

We have to keep remembering these do not show the cards put into mining duty, which are literally bought by the dozens each time. All we get from this is cards used on steam are mainly nvidias, nothing more.

>>55929144
My bad. I was using DX12 as a % which is unreliable since Windows 10 upgrades in July kicking in. The 970 fell on DX11 %. Basically the 380 and mobile Nvidia were outselling both the GTX 1060 and RX 480 by the looks of thinmgs (at least for gaming). We don't know about miners and other games (stand alone, GOG etc).

>>55929118
>It's too early to call right now.
Which is partly why I am so baffled why someone would only highlight the 480 and 1060 as "the market."

>>55929159
Miners really fucking screw AMD over on gaming numbers. Nvidia claim victory but we can never really calculate the true numbers unless we had both Nvidia's and AMD's sales figures.

>>55929209
It was more of a backlash against the last couple of months Nvidia fans throwing hissy fits about the 480 release. At least we have some indication of the 480 gaming stats now

>>55929240
>It was more of a backlash against the last couple of months
U wut m8? You are saying that AMDoublestandards are making decisions based upon incomplete information as "backlash" rather than as part of their usual standard conduct?

>>55929267
Meh! I can't (be bothered to) argue that.

>>55928924
Uhh they aren't changing at all.

The stats show Nvidia is dominating and continuing to dominate...

>>55928913
>the 970 and the 960 each outsold more than the 480 in July according to your citation. Outsold it by twice as much.


Top fucking kek.

Nvidia's 2 year old cards are outselling AMD's brand new ones.

>>55929471
>Outsold
>DX12
>Windows 10 free update ended July
>GTX 970 +0.10%
>DX11
>GTX 970 -0.03%
Keep fooling yourself.

>>55928834
What is the 1070 considered?

>>55921042
>make a $10 gpu that manages 10fps in all the current games
>best performance per dollar
No one really cares if the product underperforms, or if you can't even get it for the recommeded retail price.

>>55929566
Except it's not measured that way retard. -F Must try harder.

>>55929565
Upper mid

>>55929534
Lol bro look at the charts, all the Nvidia cards are outselling AMD by miles

>>55929566

>i-if it doesn't help my case it doesn't count
>I'll make up an unrealistic case to prove my point

>>55929566
Yeah performance per dollar is a really dumb metric.

You can get a fucking free voodoo 3dfx and it magically becomes the best performance per dollar card because ti was free, even though it performs like shit.

That's the problem with AMD cards. They're cheap garbage and they perform like cheap garbage.

ITT people don't know how to read data and try to twist it to their own ends.

July states that the total DX11 systems in use for DX11 (We need to leave out DX12/Vulkan for now due to Win10 upgrades) the GTX 970 accounts for 5.21% of the userbase. Down -0.03% from the previous month. Since it's release the GTX 970 had something like 20% of total GPU's used on Steam. Quite a big market share. But Look how things are changing.

What is more interesting is the rise in GTX 960 and 750Ti use. The GTX 1060 and RXC 480 are way way WAAAAAY down that leader board.

Even the Intel mobile chips are way above them.

Make of it what you will.

>>55929619
>Outselling
>He believes this is a sales chart
Just go away.

>>55929638
The amount of retardation ITT is almost unbelievable. But this is /g/ so...

File: steam-top-10-gpus.png (19KB, 365x220px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 365x220px

Holy shit I didn't realize just how bad AMD was doing.

This is the Steam Top 10 GPUs used.

Not a single AMD GPU in the entire list.

In fact Intel integrated graphics are many many times more popular than AMD GPUs.

>>55921014
>30% faster than 1080
>No HBM
>Double the price

No thank you. Who the fuck will buy this shit?

File: sad laugh.jpg (18KB, 258x245px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 258x245px

>>55921014
>People bought the poorfag GTX 1070

>>55929706
Yup! I am the person who posted the link BTW. Even I get that AMD don't even figure in the equation. But my point was to compare the GTX 1060 against the RX 480 for gaming and how the RX 480 was above the GTX 1060 (for now). I don't deny that Nvidia dominates in overall GPU's 'in use'. This is not a sales chart but it does indicate sales of RX 480 (at present) have outsold GTX 1060's. But again they (AMD) had a 6 week advantage.

>>55929712
Peope who don't care about price obviously. There are people earning good sums of money out there still. We poorfags can only dream from our basements.

>>55929712

hbm on consumer cards is stupid.

fury x and fury should have 8gb gddr5.

File: 1413892717265.jpg (107KB, 762x1042px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 762x1042px

>tfw upgrading to 1070 from a 560 ti

>>55929706
here's a link to the results so you can see how bad it is http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/videocard/

File: 1442357090051.jpg (29KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 500x375px

why do nvidia fans think performance per watt is a valid metric but performance per dollar isn't?

>>55926180
You're an absolute fool if you think the 1080Ti won't be somewhere in the range of $800-900

File: tmp_17954-questionmark-dog-1862661453.jpg (34KB, 500x348px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 500x348px

>>55929992

A few years ago their buzzword was performance per watt doesn't matter, now that nvidia has the edge on it suddenly it's the deciding factor for purchasing.

>>55929706
> 750ti

THERE I AM ! *waves*

File: Comicborockaokguy.gif (15KB, 289x229px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 289x229px

>Intel HD Graphics 4000 just below 750Ti
U wot m8

>>55929565
High midrange.

>>55930173

Because that's not a sales report, that's only a steam's chart of "how many people are using X card on our software?"
So anything that does not open steam even once is left out, like mining or workstation pc's

>>55930238

Riddle me this, does steam inherently detect intel's igpu even if its not in use in the system? While there are a lot of intel chips used for gaymen (lol laptops) if steam is also picking up the igpu on desktops even if a dedicated gpu is in use then that is going to artifically inflate the numbers.

>>55929858
Hbm is a temporary fix for the bandwidth limit. Even AMD knows that and prepares the next gen Memory.

File: 70a.jpg (94KB, 882x520px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 882x520px

>>55921014

gay and gimped

File: d0b.png (42KB, 362x362px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 362x362px

>tfw bought Fury X
>quiet and cool af
>best looking card of all time, without looking like some weird V8 engine
>just keeps getting better every update
>no worries about dx12/Vulkan
>comfy af with my 1440p Korean ips
>justwerks with tb Harmony and all my editing software
>don't feel bad about supporting the company because of ethics/ muh freedoms, or whatever
>new Radeon software even more comfy
>windows now has comfy dark theme
>6600k idles sub 30°C
>Fractal R4 keeps everything even quieter

Argue amongst yourselves all you like, but you'll never be as comfy as me

>>55930418

Depends. For instance, I have igpu multimonitor mode enabled in the bios, so both my 760 and hd4000 are active.
Also this hd4000 is present on both laptops and desktops, and finally never underestimate how many normies use steam

File: witcher3_3840_2160.png (460KB, 644x732px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 644x732px

60FPS@4K.

...oh my.

>>55929586
That's F- you retard. And it is pretty much the exact way it is measured. The important thing, though, is that there is basically nothing between the 1060 and the 480 in terms of performance and price. The 1060 is generally a little better and generally costs a little more, but actual prices vary greatly with some places selling 1060s cheaper than 480s.

I am sure when the 470 comes you'll all be "AMD has the price to performance crown again!" but then we are moving out of the midrange and into the low end cards that no one gives two shits about.

File: 1470245446360.png (43KB, 706x669px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 706x669px

>>55930507
>60
>57.6
ok

>>55930667

The 470 came out yesterday... Too expensive because there are no reference cards and even though its suggested price is $179, the partners which are releasing the cards are pricing them in the 480 range of $200, which means that those cards are pointless to buy until they drop down to the suggested price.

File: Untitled.png (13KB, 333x345px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 333x345px

>>55930694
>muh 2FPS difference
nVidia should be ashamed of themselves for releasing this 58FPS@4K card.

Anyhow, how is this?

>>55929159
i bought 2 480s for mining, ama.

>>55929992
>how efficient the card is vs how low you can sell a turd that is unplayable at specific resolutions yet scores high in performance/price because it's cheap

no one would buy a 480 to play at above 1080p because it'd be a useless purchase

>>55930753
Have your PCI-e sockets caught fire yet?

>>55929992
Power goes in, performance comes out. Basically we want to see cards becoming more efficient, we don't really want to see slashing of prices just to target poorfags.

>>55930753

Pretty tame considering there are single persons already going at 60+ cards