Daily reminder if that AMD did not exist we would still be using

Daily reminder that if AMD didn't exist, we would have ditched x86 for good.

>>55919723
nah, if AMD wasn't around Cyrix or Via or someone would have taken their place. Or maybe IBM or Fujitsu or Zilog or one of the other dozen chipmakers of the 80s. Or shit, maybe Alpha or MIPS or some other architecture would have overtaken x86.

Reminder if AMD didn't exist my feet would freeze in the winter

>>55919792
my i5 gets way hotter than my fx chip ever did. that only really applies to their graphics cards nowadays.

>>55919876
Did you do any type of overclocking and did you use the thermal paste meme?

>>55919894
yes but my amd cpu was overclocked as well. 77C max on the intel chip, while i never went above 61C on the amd one.

>>55919965
Which gen i5 was it?

>>55919965
>things never happened

>>55919983
4690k
>>55919988
it did tho

>>55919723

Daily reminder that correlation doesn't imply causation.

>>55919988
Intel cpus are hot af do to the fact that the heat spreader isn't soldered to the die

>>55919723
I would reallllly like if amd fixed itself or if ibm bought it.

>>55920015
Do you really think being this autistic adds anything to the thread?

Your highend PC was as fast then as it is now, but due to more limitations we had better games and leaner software.

I wish that would have actually happened.

>>55920187
The thread is shit and you must kill yourself.

>>55919765
To what?

>>55920321
Itanium clearly.

>>55920339
Itanium is housefire tier garbage

>>55920618
If AMD wasn't around intel would have pushed it onto the market. Top down. They would have had their Itanium arch compete directly against POWER in the datacenter, and they would have continued uninterrupted to bribe OEMs, only now to use Itanium based desktop chips.

daily reminder that the 480 would have been a rebranded 390x if based nvidia didn't exist.

>>55919723
no we woodent

now fukk off

>>55920339
>>55920618
>>55920660
How powerful was it?

>>55921030
Not justifiably more powerful than X86 for a 250 watt cpu

>>55919723
If AMD someone else would because IBM required two vendors for all the parts in their PCs, which is why AMD got in the x86 game in the first place. Given whoever would take AMD's place in an AMD free world didn't bother developing AMD64 like AMD did we'd be stuck with Itanium CPUs

>>55919723
Daily reminder AMD hasn't been relevant in the CPU market for over a decade and they desperately cling to the 3 years in the history of their company when they were relevant despite being sub par before and after then.

>>55919988
It's true. AMD chips are only safe to be pushed to 65C until they start throttling, while Intels are safe to run at 80C

I don't know where the housefire meme comes from.

What if zen introduces 128bit?

Daily reminder that if Intel didn't exist, AMD wouldn't exist.

>>55923006
Daily reminder that if AMD ceases to exist you instantly pay double or more.

>>55921030
It's shit

Daily reminder that OP is a fag

>>55922952
What if you went back to /v/?

File: 1407203693589.png (36KB, 1042x708px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 1042x708px

>>55920339

Daily reminder that Kaiser Reinhard von Lohengramm was victorious over the Free Planet Alliance's Yang Wen-Li. Manjaro was installed Empire wide and the people rejoiced.