Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5
File: Pascal-Mobility-Flagship-Benchmarks--635x202.jpg (23KB, 635x202px) Image search:
[Google]
23KB, 635x202px
http://wccftech.com/geforce-pascal-mobility-1080m-1070m-1060m-launching-gamescom/
>AMD literally BLOWN THE FUCK OUT OF THE MARKET
>AMD FILLING FOR BANKRUPTCY
Nvidia's 1080M is performs higher than a regular Geforce Titan X(not the new 2016 version)
this is a mobile gpu
>>
>almost 3 times faster than 980Ti
Whoa........
>>
Are you even trying anymore?
>>
>>55913103
>>55913093
Check the scale of that graph again before you sound more retarded.
>>
>>55913093
It would perform better if it wasn't gimped by a laptop cpu, you'll be lucky to get 980 performance compared to a desktop, yet alone a 980 ti.
>>
>>55913103
>>55913117
>>55913125
do you even know the difference between a mobile gpu and a desktop gpu
>>
>>55913103
it's more like 3% faster, look at the scale
>>
look mom I can play 3dmark
>>
>>55913093
>50 niggerinos more of a total of 20k
WEW
>>
Why do they even bother with the mobile line at this point?
The laptop GPUs are so damn close to the desktop equvalents, that they should just throw the desktop card in there.
Like they already did with the 980
>>
>>55913093
>is performs higher than
Hello Pajeet!
>>
File: 1469661570175.png (177KB, 697x768px) Image search:
[Google]
177KB, 697x768px
>dat scale and truncated axis
Is this the power of Nvidia shilling? Not bad...
>>
>>55914681
this lmao
>>
File: 1469950170085.jpg (37KB, 720x405px) Image search:
[Google]
37KB, 720x405px
>>55913093
>Shitty english
>Graph with a 3% scale
Did you receive a pay cut, Pajeet?
>>
File: tax cut.jpg (40KB, 590x440px) Image search:
[Google]
40KB, 590x440px
>>55913125
Oh wow, fucking these graphs again.
Thread posts: 15
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5