>your os does things you don't want it to do >you

>>55876222
You know how some people complain about small, annoying-but-not-very-harmful changes, often mentioning that if we allow these changes, worse and worse changes will follow?

"Slippery slope" is not always a logical fallacy.

>your os doesn't do things you want it to
>or much at all really

[YYYY]

File: 1452991575219.png (338KB, 620x384px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 620x384px

>>55876258
slippery slope is pretty much never a fallacy

>>55876270
YYYY-MM-DD
ISO 8601 please sempai

>>55876222
well we wouldve installed linux but you can say bye to half your programs and waste half your life trying to figure out solutions to problems that are just there to annoy you

>>55877407
meanwhile you were born knowing windows

it's like making your own bread from wheat berries vs. eating wonderbread. take whatever analogy you like, just buy the mass-produced corporate solution and never learn any of the fundamental skills for yourself because it's too difficult, and in doing so accept all the other garbage that goes into it

I make my own bread and run linux

The problem with slippery slope being a fallacy is that people are much less likely to object to a series of small objectionable changes than to making all of those changes at once. This in mind, people wishing to exact a big, objectionable change often attempt to break it into many smaller easily digested chunks.