So are you still stuck with your inherently anti-parallel paradigms

>>55855771
>Why not embrace Erlang

maybe

> and Haskell?

No

Having seen Haskell, it's not the future, it's a garbage dumb for academic cum.

>>55855820
/thread

>>55855771
>>55855820
if anything, elixir is where it's at now

>>55856749
ok pajeet

>>55856801
ok pajeet

>>55856811
It's not okay at all, really

Kill yourself

>>55856785
>if anything, elixir is where it's at now

Great, another language to learn. Just add your new paradigm to an already existing language ffs.

>>55856883
If you know Elixir, you pretty much know Erlang and you have access to anything in Erlang. Elixir is just a more modern frontend to Erlang.

>>55856883
>add your paradigm to an existing language
this is why lisp is the future

>>55856927
>this is why lisp is the future

No joke, I think this is what Lisp is good at.
Frankly I don't want to learn an entire new language just because of a feature I like. Just add it to a Lisp and be done with it.
Now, somebody should make a Lispy systems language.

>>55856916
>Elixir is just a more modern frontend to Erlang.

Is it better than Lisp Flavored Erlang?

>>55856957
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PreScheme