6700K could have been a 8 core processor if Intel didn't

>>55836434
but they have 8 core processor. only $999 :^)

>>55836434
>he buys consumer shit,and get mad

you are a retard and should have bought xeon fag

Fuck off AMD shill
MOAR COARS
jesus
I never found anything that needs more than 4 cores

File: 1406882939196.jpg (607KB, 1846x1923px) Image search: [Google]

607KB, 1846x1923px

>>55836517
>>55836527

Yes yes goy, you only need 4 cores...

>>55836548
Running a i7 2600k and having no issues and do not feel a need to upgrade.

>>55836548
kill yourself imbecile

File: 1467469222127.jpg (16KB, 480x444px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 480x444px

>>55836434
>still running an i7 920
>facebook and 4chan run fine on max settings
Why would I bother upgrading?

No it fucking couldn't, learn a thing or two about IC design

File: DeepinScreenshot20160731000405.png (17KB, 431x176px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 431x176px

>>55836592
Wew lad, you really fired some shots there!

>>55836434
>6700K could have been a 8 core processor if Intel didn't waste the die space on a GPU
I hope you're not this fucking retarded.

No it wouldn't, you can't strap on more cores to the same uncore and expect to get something from it.

>>55836487
You can get a 22 core for that price:
www.ebay.com/itm/112066941952

>>55836566
Same here, can do 4200mhz completely comfortable and doesn't even reach 60 celcius.

>>55837178
Implying I'd buy an engineering sample from China

>>55836434
These iGPUs and later and still the only GPUs that're using the full DX12 feature set though.

I bought a 6700k, did I fuck up?

File: oy_shiggy.jpg (69KB, 890x890px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 890x890px

>>55836434
>implying intel would ever make an octacore with a price tag of under $600.

>>55836434
Good news the 6800k is out, I doubt you have the money but enjoy.
>>55837613
The fucked up thing about the 6700k, their top tier consumer CPU, is that it uses a meak GPU with HALF the processing throughput of their very next iGPU.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_HD_and_Iris_Graphics#Skylake

>>55837744
Still 2 less cores than Summit Ridge will be.

Intel are going to have to stop getting lazy.

In fairness to the OP.. the GPU isn't just stitched on, it's the same wafer, right? So in the event that any part of that huge die is flawed, it's all wrecked? So they'd have better success rates in fabrication if they didn't have the GPU component? Maybe the space could otherwise be used.. but there's likely nothing else that would reasonable fall into their philosophies or quality control. They're not gonna throw in shitty extra slave cores like a playstation.
>>55837663
Not unless you have an extra $400 and need that double size professional size cache of the 6800k or true quad channel DDR4 memory rather than sufficient 2 sticks or 4 with time slicing and want to pay stupid money from pro grade motherboards.

>>55837744
Gaming gains visible only in huge scale RTS.
>>55837796
Design (architecture) is just more important than cores. Core are slowly becoming relevant but good and real programming parallelism is only just receiving a renaissance.

>>55837924
Implying Sega can use more than one core with total war.

>>55836434
Thats where they keep the IME backdoor

>>55836434
Your parents could've made something of their lives if they hadn't had you.

>>55837827
>make 4 more cores instead of a garbage GPU only my grandma uses
>use binning, like they already do anyway
>twice less failure rate if you target 4 cores, plus "exclusive" 8 core CPUs
>for free
Like, I really don't understand. The budget CPUs I get it, the people would benefit from iGPU. But in enthusiast CPUs?

>>55837796

summit ridge is HEDT, not mainstream.

>>55840320
>enthusiast cpu
>6700k
>what are E series processors

>>55840217

IME backdoor

This, 10x this. The previous chip wasn't called Devil's Canyon by coincidence, *lake are all designed in Haifa, Israel