Why doesn't Intel make a discrete GPU? Their 14nm process

>>55809463
Their embedded gpus are good enough for anything you might want to do except muh gaymen

Because they aren't capabale of making them competitive.

>>55809487
>4k video rendering
>intel igpu
lol

>>55809463
I'm curious about this too, they could make a dual GPU option like AMD did so you can game for cheap with the igpu.

>>55809535
Literally just works

>>55809535
>smartphone soc can output 4k
>somehow intel igpu won't be able
retard

>>55809621
You seem to think you are a big tough guy...

>>55809463
Doesn't matter

>>55809630
UUUU

>>55809487
>dedicated GPUs are only good for gaymen
Sure thing, kiddo.

>>55809535
>1.- Work with proxies in Adobe premiere
>2.- Finish video and let it render overnight
>3.- ?????
>4.- Profit

They'll be coming out with a 10nm process next year too

>>55809463
Are you asking why they don't make them again? Intel already sold graphics cards and failed miserably.

>>55809463
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel740

They don't bother currently because they would have to actually compete. Intel already uses bribery among other questionable acts to maintain it's current business.

They just need to buy ATi back from AMD

>>55809621
>rendering
>output
I don't think those two things mean what you think they mean

>>55809463
They tried.
It turned out so badly it became a co-processor.

>>55811172
OP actually posted a photo of it

File: images (12).jpg (28KB, 480x307px)

28KB, 480x307px

>>55809463
They made one discrete GPU but it was so bad that intel decided to move away from the dGPU market

>>55809463
They could try to turn their Phi's into one. Would be an interesting outcome.

>>55811204
Not really. They made it to promote agp and it did just that, quite successfully too.

>>55811224
That's what the Phi initially was.

>>55810441
If this happened it would be great for the gpu market, amds lack of cash is holdomg back ati

>>55809463
They tried, they failed. Also: profit margin would be low compared to CPUs.

On the other hand their IGPs can compete with low cost GPUs, though they are still far from comparable with AMDs IGP.

>>55811141
If the discussion is about video then people should really be using words like 'encode' and 'decode'

>>55809463
Integrated graphics on a dedicated chip would be balls and have terrible price/performance
>>55809545
Dual graphics mode never worked well

>>55811345
Rendering and encoding are two different things, you fucking retard.

>>55809463
Architecture and man hours.

Might see some paprellel atom type shit maybe.

>>55810180
Worked for Nvidia, and Intel probably has a fatter wad roll.

>>55811345
Or maybe you need to stop being retarded and learn to read.