SSDs are memes. The speed decreases to 40% in a few months.

File: 1466178654120.png (30KB, 384x341px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 384x341px

>>55785075
SATA3 drive on a SATA2 bus, 6 months old, getting pretty much the realistic maximum performance it could get.

Fuck yourself.

File: 1467467830810.png (58KB, 228x221px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 228x221px

>>55785075

>>55785075
Cry

>>55785075
it's your fault that you bought ssd with new crappy tech which wears off after half a year, i got mx100 with old tech and it is still working fine for the most part still 434mb/s read and 327mb/s write

File: wtf.jpg (11KB, 260x194px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 260x194px

>>55785075

My SSD is still going fine and speedy after 9 months.

File: Samsung Magician_2016-07-27_15-25-00.png (97KB, 1024x728px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1024x728px

Mine are working about the same after ~6 months of owning this laptop

This Samsung proggy is shit though, you can't even resize the window.

>>55785345(You)

>>55785075
lmao just get non chinkshit ssd

File: .png (151KB, 1920x796px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 1920x796px

>>55785075
You should stop doing whatever you're doing. Like living.

>>55785345(You)

>>55785345(You)

File: ssd.png (21KB, 737x321px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 737x321px

>>55785075
Mine still works great after about a year

File: ASDASD.jpg (10KB, 404x141px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 404x141px

>>55785444
SEE YOU WHEN YOU HIT 10 TB TOTAL BYTES WRITTEN. enjoy your happy days while you can.

even if you were right the main advantage of a ssd is random access latency

it will not decrease by much and hard drives will never match it

>>55785075
>thinking write speeds are why most people get SSDs
Read a book

File: samsung.png (21KB, 749x327px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 749x327px

>>55785075
i've had this one for two years now with nearly 12TBs written on it.

>>55785677
Why are you showing us your RAM speed. Disable rapid mode and try again.

I have a 5yr old 128gb crucial m4 and it is still running at advertised speeds. Bought 2011.

File: (You).jpg (71KB, 402x367px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 402x367px

>>55785075

8 months old cheapass BX200

Here's your (You)

>>55785483
>>55785677
why are you writing that much to an ssd

>>55785075
You look like you're using it via SATA II 3Gb/s interface, you fucking faggot.

t. sata 2 user

>>55785913
had to reinstall windows a few times. also defragged to see if it changes anything. free space defragged to use over provisioning.

>>55785345
you are fat

>>55786254
>defragmenting an SSD

PEBCAK.

>>55786367
Oh look everyone, it's that autistic guy again

>>55786391
A lot of autistic people are proud of themselves and their skills. Are you proud of being a fat tripfag?

>>55786713
No, I'm a failure at everything I ever touch or attempt to do lol.

>>55785075
Are you using TRIM? Is the SSD full?

>>55786728
Jesus that was a fast reply for a thread on page 5.
What are you doing with your life?

>>55786391
Not him but you are
1. Virgin, you will die virgin
2. Obese (over 40 BMI) manlet
3. You live with your mom
4. You are mentally handicapped
5. You are also a retarded tripfag
6. You are afraid to communicate with people irl
7. You are too afraid to pay your tax without your moms help
If you have balls to deny 1 (ONE) singe claim, now is your chance

>>55786797
Also,
8. You haven't done anything in your life that your parents are proud of, neither you will be able to do it in future

Your life is a massive disappointment

@55786797
@55786818
@55786748
@55786713
@55786367
pls don't bully jordan

55786858, sure thing, "jordan"

I'm not jordan

Image it, do a Secure ATA wipe on it (takes like 5 seconds), restore image, performance will return.

>>55786740
I do, and SSD is not full
>>55786904
scientific explanation or gtfo
>>55785902
it's not actually about months it's how much you use them

>>55785075
>samsung

not even an ssd fag, but seriously, nigga pls

File: ssdmemes.png (63KB, 1015x543px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1015x543px

>his SSD doesn't push 5400 MB/s

Pleb.

>>55786995
>i don't understand rapid mode or ram caching

fucking tech illiterate retard

>>55786995
>>55785747

File: maym.png (114KB, 1023x731px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1023x731px

Boot drive since July 2013.

File: fhfgh.jpg (44KB, 754x328px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 754x328px

>>55785075
>Buying 750 EVO
>Buying TLC shit EVO at all
Pic related my 2 year old 840 Pro, 20 TBW
Write will be higher when I close programs

>>55787079
>>55787039

Why would I turn it off?

If my SSD wants to use my RAM as a cache. It should.

File: samsung2.png (21KB, 748x328px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 748x328px

>>55785747
Here you go, buttercup. Forgot rapid mode was on when I did that last benchmark. 12TB and several years.

>>55787134
then why make objectively wrong statements?

>his SSD doesn't push 5400 MB/s

you were trying to show off your ssd speed, which this thread is about. what you were showing off instead are your ram speeds you tech illiterate waste of bandwidth

File: sm 951.jpg (38KB, 407x371px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 407x371px

>all these poorfags without NVMe

i thought this was a tech forum

>>55787171
My SSD caches my files in the RAM

When I access those cached files, it does that with those speeds. Therefore, my SSD let's me access my files with those speeds. Therefore these are my SSD's speeds.

>>55787205
you are beyond retarded. keep believing what you want, your ssd is physically capped at at most 550mb read. that is a fact and ram caching won't change it.

>>55787205
>i still don't understand rapid mode and ram caching

keep going, this is entertaining

>>55787225
>saying I'm wrong without explaining how

Stay jealous.

>>55787244
See >>55787249

>>55787205
How do you suppose the SSD loads the data into RAM at these speeds when read/write is capped at 540MiB???? Are you retarded?

>>55787189
>MFW I would have a NVMe disk if my Z77 platform supported it

File: hue.png (53KB, 745x619px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 745x619px

riddle me this

>be me
>buy Intel SSD
>it actually performs better than advertised specs
>mfw AMD will never compete

>>55787249
>>55787267
>googling is hard
>p-please educate me senpai

https://techreport.com/review/25282/a-closer-look-at-rapid-dram-caching-on-the-samsung-840-evo-ssd

read up you fucking moron

>>55787294
Torrents?

>>55787205
>yfw ram caching actually increases access times, making your precious ssd slower in the process

LOL

How fucking stupid are you?

>>55787325
i don't torrent .
I had it as a main drive for a few years with an absolutely massive page file for windows because i was being an idiot and thought it was fixing an issue i was having.
I have a 850 pro as my main drive but i don't have the massive page anymore .

>>55787318
> Samsung says RAPID mode is used primarily to accelerate read performance. Data is speculatively loaded into the cache based on user access patterns. The caching intelligence considers several factors, including how frequently and recently the data has been accessed. It also discriminates against large media files to avoid polluting the cache with data that may not benefit from quicker access times.

So like I said, my most used files get cached in the RAM for faster access times when I need them. You just proved me right, retard. Next time at least read what you cite before you do.

File: 1468807609509.jpg (17KB, 557x365px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 557x365px

>>55785075
>bought a shitty low price ssd with a shitty microcontroller

>WAHH I FELL FOR THE MEME MEME MEMES!!!

File: overall.gif (12KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 480x480px

>>55787382
maybe read the whole article you complete fucking imbecile

whatever, it's your machine. do whatever you want with it. just don't come in a thread about ssd speeds showing off your ram speeds next time. you're just embarrassing yourself further

File: serious..png (202KB, 367x380px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 367x380px

>>55786995
I can't tell if this is bait or if the guy is just uninformed.

>>55787407
That's overall performance, retard.

When it comes to the most used files/programs, it beats the fuck out of a stock performance.

It probably not gonna do a thing for some shit that you access once in eternity.

File: 50 cent haha hehe.png (23KB, 223x229px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 223x229px

>>55787457
>he still hasn't read the article
>he still thinks a SATA SSD can get 5400MiB read speeds

keep going mate

File: serious.jpg (113KB, 766x709px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 766x709px

>>55787205
Yep, it's bait.

File: Screen Shot 2016-07-27 at 6.55.54 PM.png (86KB, 592x642px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 592x642px

>>55785075
SATA III drive on a SATA II bus. This drive is a year old and has critical health status, no TRIM, still performing at close to maximum speed. Fuck you OP.

File: SSD meme.jpg (73KB, 414x377px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 414x377px

Is this fast guys? It feels pretty fast

File: dataaaaaaa.png (90KB, 411x374px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 411x374px

Some day I'll SSD

>>55787641
cool

>>55786797
>>55786818
I'm not really a manlet, I'm almost 6 feet tall.

>>55787655
Not bad if that ain't an SSD, even if it's a huge raid or something that's usable at least

File: DiskMark64_2016-07-27_18-25-28.png (122KB, 602x548px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 602x548px

>>55787641
Not especially fast mate

>>55785075
>samsung

gee what a shock

buy crucial or intel next time summerfriend

>>55785075
I've got 28.8T of SAS SSD that would disagree with you (24x 1.2T)

Tiered storage is where it's at right now, at least in the enterprise.

Even the small server pushes 4x 480GB PNY 1311 in front of 12 3TB Hitachi's.

Systems are SSD as well.

But, even if they slow down to spindle speeds, they still win, because they handle impact (laptops) better.

But that's alright, anon, you can continue to be a raging faggot.

>>55785275
I dunno man I regret buying the MX100 drive health starts dropping as soon as I write to it.

I wish I paid a bit more for something with more write capability, my friend has an intel with more than double my writes and still has 100% health.

>>55786797
Holy shit what a pathetic piece of shit wow

>>55787457
Fucking retard

File: mx100.png (238KB, 673x293px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 673x293px

>>55789145
forgot pic.

>>55788511
>But, even if they slow down to spindle speeds, they still win, because they handle impact (laptops) better.
not to mention less power and less weight.

>>55786748

Haven't you heard about his "Internet battles I've won" log? I know you're watching this thread stupid tripfag so at least be useful and dump caps of your cringey shit.

File: cdmrd.png (212KB, 805x383px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 805x383px

Bench Thread?

File: 2016-07-27_19-55-43.png (384KB, 2756x2160px) Image search: [Google]

384KB, 2756x2160px

>>55789232
I don't see anything wrong with keeping a good log of your online activities.

>>55789178
wow you sure showed me

>>55789301
lol epic.

>>55785075
>750 EVO
>Probably under SATA1/2.
You got chinked son.

Are you on xp op? Do you even TRIM? Is your disk encrypted?

>>55789301
I actually never thought autism was just a meme in 4chan, but you prove me wrong. Do you speak to doctors? I know you should

>>55785444
Brah move your browser profile folder elsewhere. Shit's brutal on ssds and accumulates writes p fast.

>>55791295
Why would I talk to a doctor when autism on 4chan is only a meme?

>>55791300
>brutal on SSDs
oh you mean those cheap 128GB TLC SSDs that can only handle 250TB of writes?
http://www.anandtech.com/show/8747/samsung-ssd-850-evo-review/4

File: access time.png (27KB, 979x280px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 979x280px

HDDs are fucking trash technology and I wish I didn't have to use them. You pathetic HDDobo memers don't deserve to live.

Image related is all you need to see, in spite of the countless other failings of the archaic garbage that can be listed off. It would be literally impossible for an SSD to ever """degrade""" to the point of that caveman junk.

File: 1469608127526.gif (2MB, 540x404px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 540x404px

>>55785075
>hi /g/ i am a retard
have fun with you're ancient 50's disc storage

Meanwhile SSD's are cheap and quick and getting bigger every year

File: comparison.png (85KB, 1016x505px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1016x505px

I'm actually getting better bench results today than i did back in 2014, probably because of newer firmware. Crucial M4 128. Purchased in 2011, used daily since then.

Also all these people saying you should move stuff like pagefiles off the SSD - literally what the fuck is the point of even having an SSD if you don't actually use them for where they make the biggest difference? I even torrented on my SSD for a while, cmon they're not THAT expensive.

File: Screenshot from 2016-07-28 14-08-18.png (10KB, 569x65px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 569x65px

>>55791316
Everything will be fine, Leet. Tomorrow is a better day, until you finally decide to hang yourself.

>>55791626
>I never thought autism was just a meme
>I was proven wrong
Therefore, you were stating that autism is in fact just a meme.

Maybe you'll learn English a little better in the eighth grade next year, Timmy.

>>55791625
This, you're also probably never going to ``overuse'' it unless you specifically try to

>>55786368
Haven't seen that error message in quite some time! Cheers to you king IT

File: 2016-07-27_23-17-31.png (705KB, 2160x3840px) Image search: [Google]

705KB, 2160x3840px

>>55791686
Well it's actually used on /g/ pretty often.
I used it just yesterday, as the archives show.

>>55785075
>see thread
>download samsung magician
>my oldest samsung 850 pro (os drive) sequential write 192MB/s
>my wd hdd sequential write 289MB/s
>hdd can write faster than ssd

at least my newer 850pro is at 519MB/s i guess, and i don't do much writing on the older one anymore since it is basically full

>>55785075
Just having the swap or pagefile on ssd is a massive improvement

wow that's a pretty amazing 1 data point OP.

let me counter with my 5 SSDs totalling 1.75tb that are over a year old, used almost daily, and they all go just as fast as the day I bought them.

(and also the 30 odd intel datacenter SSDs in the machines I am responsible for at work)

>>55785345
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgHNtzxO0y8