>Google Heaven Benchmark >Download Benchmark >Run Benchmark

>gayming benchmark

>>55747505

>download random.exe
>run random.exe
>use dickblows at all

Yea, how 'bout no?

File: Heaven.png (32KB, 831x700px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 831x700px

>>55747505

File: 2016-07-25-132800_346x338_scrot.png (103KB, 346x338px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 346x338px

I can't download it

BECAUSE THIS ISN'T A FUCKING GAMING BOARD WITH USERS WHO USE WINDOWS FUCK YOU

>bonchmork
>vodeo gomos

File: valley31.png (47KB, 503x449px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 503x449px

>>55747505
Heaven? Is it still 2010?

>>55749177
>using a computer
Are you crazy? Turn that shit off and go back to your bunker before they find you!

>>55752108
Heaven is a far better pure GPU benchmark. Valley requires you to have a top tier CPU to post a competitive result.

>>55752412
I never thought Valley was that cpu intensive?

File: durr.png (2MB, 1718x963px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1718x963px

>>55750491
Idiot.

>>55752412
That may be true (I don't know if it is, just saying I'm open to the idea that it might be) but there are also likely far better benchmarks out there purely for the GPU. If the intention is to get a comparable gaming benchmark (I'm guessing that's what most of us are using our graphics cards for) then Valley would be better.

File: fug.png (143KB, 557x508px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 557x508px

eGPU

>>55752577
Is that overclocked at all?

File: Untitled.png (33KB, 391x489px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 391x489px

>>55752627

cpu is stock, didn't bother switching profiles.
1070 @ 2075mhz altho gpu-z has me at 2100 so something in that range. just got so haven't tried to push it further.

>>55752691
You should push the memory while you're at it, the chips can go pretty far on most cards

File: scam.jpg (92KB, 790x538px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 790x538px

It's a scam.

>>55752422
It very much is. In a single-threaded fashion though, so AMD CPUs suffer more than most.

>>55752583
Depends what you're looking for. If you want an example of how CPU bottlenecks can hold your card back, Valley is better. If you actually want to see the performance of your GPU unshackled, Heaven is better. But again, Valley is very much dependent on single thread performance, whilst most games from the past couple of years aren't. It's not a "realistic" benchmark of CPU bottlenecking in that sense, as we've finally started to move away from games using two threads at most.

File: r9 290 2.png (26KB, 581x671px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 581x671px

>>55753113

Ran it again without Dota 2 open on my other screen.

>>55753164
>If you actually want to see the performance of your GPU unshackled, Heaven is better.
Like I said, there are even better benchmarks for that that rely on the CPU even less. If you want a more realistic representation of how good a computer is for gaming then Valley is a good choice.

>>55749177
It's also in the AUR

>>55753635
>No tessellation
>Not extreme
How do one even benchmark?

File: Screenshot_32.png (33KB, 601x726px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 601x726px

I feel like something's wrong with my card.

>>55754422
yep