Why haven't we yet analyzed the electric output from the optic nerve of the human eye? Or, for that matter, any other creature? It could result in breakthroughs for visual transmission technology.
We have? It's insufficient information for interpreting sensory information. You need several nuclei with untold numbers of neurons to do that, which is something we simply can't model accurately yet.
The problem is more of routing than simply replicating the action potentials themselves.
>>55742049
>Why haven't we yet analyzed the electric output from the optic nerve of the human eye?
we have
"In the Phase 1 trial of the SSMP 16-electrode device, six subjects with severe RP were implanted with ongoing, continuing testing since then. First, it was evident that even limited sight restoration is a slow, learning process that takes months for improvement to become evident. However, light perception was restored in all six patients. Moreover, all subjects ultimately saw discrete phosphenes and could perform simple visual spatial and motion tasks."
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079612309175222
>>55742049
Why? Do you want to overclock an eyeball??
>>55743430
>overclock eye
>overheats
>get BSOD
>actually die irl
>>55742049
Did you see the cat sight experiments where they see what the cat is seeing? Shit is whack. Low resolution because of limited number of electrodes, but human faces have cat characteristics.
>>55743500
>not waiting for the aftermarket eyeball 480
You gotta think senpai