IT'S FINALLY HERE!!!* *give away, not the release date

>>55698950
I honestly might go for the PowerColour card this time.

The Devil13 cooler is thicc af famalam [italian fingers][broken tear-ducts].

That and I prefer jewish demons to regular demons, cause they just steal my money, not my internal organs.

>not posting the link
http://sapphirenation.net/nitroyear/

File: nitro-480-hitman-100673120-orig[1].png (38KB, 1204x1969px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 1204x1969px

>1.5 more fps than the reference model

LOL

File: 1446188353234.png (41KB, 802x799px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 802x799px

>>55699076
DELETE THIS

>>55698950
the 3dmark score is 14000, 1500 above the 12500 of the reference, also the GTX 1060 is at about 13500 so this is going to be interesting.

>>55699076
and now show DX11 game.

File: 1469067980384.png (110KB, 1591x639px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1591x639px

>>55699179
here

File: oc2-2[1].png (17KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 800x600px

http://www.eteknix.com/sapphire-nitro-rx-480-oc-8gb-graphics-card-review/10/

>Once overclocked, the boost clock hovers around 1360MHz, and a few slight drop offs bring the average down to 1359.8MHz. Please note, I did try to push the clock further and even added large amounts of voltage to no avail.

>>55699076
wtf, so I waited for nothing??

File: temmps[1].png (15KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 800x600px

>>55699191

>still hits ~76c at load

File: 0276X5g.jpg (71KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 720x540px

>>55698950
>http://www.eteknix.com/sapphire-nitro-rx-480-oc-8gb-graphics-card-review/
I was looking forward to see what this card would do, but it's very underwhelming. More expensive than a 390X but with slightly worse performance.

Polaris in general has been pretty disappointing, and Vega will no doubt be Fury-X2.0
>An overclockers dream
>will bury the 980Ti
>Nvidia killer!

>>55699191
>eteknix

File: 1467287193119.jpg (138KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 653x726px

>>55699206
>52C idle

File: 2016-06-07_06h08_01.png (225KB, 830x658px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 830x658px

>>55699191
>amd cant overclock
>eteknix
find a better source that one is shit

File: UpTNrfW.jpg (111KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 640x640px

>>55698950
I went to the website, looked at it for a minute, and then decided that I didn't want that card even if they gave it to me

>>55699222
>>55699240
>http://www.pcworld.com/article/3098825/components-graphics/sapphire-nitro-rx-480-review-polaris-rethought-and-refined.html
On average it performs worse than reference 1060

The reviews for nitro are only just being released, so we should more over the next few hours.

>>55699206
>52C idle
>75C load
>aftermarket cooler
JUST

>>55699264
again find a better source any source that says amd cant overclock are shills and i proved that to be false

>>55699076
Third party cards are always about cooling and oc u sperg

>>55699298
You find the sources you fucking faggot, i'm not your personal secretary

>>55699313
wow well i found one >>55699190

>>55698950
2 weeks till release my man.
only went into production today.

>>55698950
Besides the power draw, is there a reason to get this over the r9 fury if theyre in the same price bracket?

>>55699206
What the fuck is this shit? What was the room temperature? 40C? Where they testing in the middle of the dessert? My HD7950 idles at 33C when room temperature is 27C. And I was really looking forward to upgrade.

>>55699323
That was a leaked graph from reddit. It was confirmed bullshit. I'll see if I can find the thread again.

>>55699231
The fans don't spin at idle, dickhead.

>>55699076

how is a 380 beating a 380x and a 970? wtf

>>55699298
>what is binning

>>55699206
>thinking 50-70 is bad for a gpu
they are rated upto 120'c and generally cut out around mid 90s
not that ive burned nvidia or amd cards before or anything.

>>55699313
>>55699364
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/4tum2s/sapphire_rx_480_nitro_benchmarks_crysis_3_w3_gta/

>>55699392
I'd prefer my room to not be a sauna

>>55699405
>Only benchmark that bothered overclocking it
like i said, it doesn't suit nvidia to overclock the 1060 and 480 so the shills wont do it.

>>55699392
>75C
>at stock speeds
>on open bench
>not bad
Wut? Imagine what kind of temps you will be getting in a closed case and OC.

>>55699411
It emits the same amount of heat, retard, the only difference is the fans either don't spin and it's retained in the heatsink (less noise) or they do spin and it's pumped into the room.

It's like you morons never went to a high school science class.

>>55699374
>what is my reference 290x is at 1200mhz amd cant overclock is a meme pushed by nvidia shills

File: Nitro air flow.gif (305KB, 650x447px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 650x447px

>>55698950
>>55699206
>>55699231
>>55699281
>>55699347
This is why temps are so high
>high quality thermal engineering

>>55699324
Fuck this, was going to buy a nitro, but waiting another month? Fuck you amd, this is one big fail

>>55699439
Does your retarded ass think for a second those fans are at 100%?
If the curve states 75c should be the max, the card will be at 75c in a case with piss-poor ventilation on a 45c day.

>everyone wants 480 nitro before it release because it looks cool
>75C, 20 MHz OC
Amazing.

>>55699461
fans literally turn off for idle with the card.

>>55699456
>20% OC
>thinks it's a lot
I would like to remind you that the 79XX cards could get 25%-30% OC without touching the power or the voltage sliders.

do you think AMD AIBs regret partnering with them? I can't imagine that Sapphire doesn't resent AMD at least a bit, for continually putting out shit products vs Nvidia

>>55699483
>the graphics card consumes just over 300 watts
>http://www.eteknix.com/sapphire-nitro-rx-480-oc-8gb-graphics-card-review/11/
JUST
OVER
300
WATTS

>>55699516
ASUS just uses their coolers from nvidia cards and stick them on AMD cards.

Not much effort goes into that.

>>55699523
total system retard.

>>55699523
>review without stock 1060 or stock 480
>reviewer failed to OC even when he tried
literally dumbest review I have seen in a while.

>>55699547
It's because 480s simply don't OC.

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/RX_480_STRIX_OC/26.html

File: 1449556364871.jpg (30KB, 492x341px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 492x341px

>>55699529

>>55699439
if you have your case fans setup correctly, it would be cooler as airflow is higher.

>>55699461
dont fool anyone, this is from their website as an example ofbad airflow that is NOT the air flow stuff they market the card with.

>>55699561
It does and if you think otherwise your a fucking retarded nvidia shill
>>>/v/

>>55699523
>ethnics knowing about computers
>GeniusBlackKidBuildsOwnComputerSavesMoney.jpg

File: 1467302016288.jpg (52KB, 568x612px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 568x612px

>>55699544
>>55699547
>>55699575
>>55699577
AMDrones in damage control
>Failed RX 480 Launch 2.0

I can't wait to see what the next failure will be.

>>55699561
>1266mhz to 1350mhz with a reference cooler
>hurr they don't overclock

>>55699601
>6.6% overclock
>good
kek

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_7950/30.html
Here's a good overclock.

>>55699597
I use nvidia

>>55698950
they have to find boards which actually can overclock that high

>>55699628
And that 6.6% results in a bigger framerate jump than my old 280X did going all the way up to 1200mhz.

>damn near 100mhz when the card is at the limits of its power and with a very cheap cooler
>massive cooler and 8-pin
>hurr no overclock

>>55699661
>And that 6.6% results in a bigger framerate jump
Only on vulkan.

Congrats. You got a big boost in 1 game. Shame all the rest is insignificant.

>no price
>no release date

At this pace we will see vega before custom 480 hit the market

Jesus christ

>>55699231
>>55699367

This is true. I wonder if it's possible to disable this feature though, and have them slowly spin at idle.

>>55699702
review site said only 20$ more than reference.

>>55699661
My link showed the reference card going from 1266 MHz to 1335 MHz. I was willing to ignore that it suddenly turned into 1350 MHz, but now it turned into "damn near 100 MHz". 69 MHz is not particularly near 100 MHz.

Strix only went 20 MHz higher on TPU. Nitro 1360 MHz on eteknix, basically the same number as Strix. But no, these aren't good enough for you. They're wrong. They don't know how to OC. RX 480 OCs really well! I know it for sure! Sapphire told me that they can reach 1500 MHz!

Do you not realize how desperate and retarded you sound?

>>55699076
>10 more fps than the competing card that's more expensive

LOL

File: nitro.png (17KB, 893x373px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 893x373px

>>55699733
>Sapphire told me that they can reach 1500 MHz!
The funny thing is sapphire didn't say this. It was a rumor started by someone who claimed to have a brother working for an AIB partner, and custom boards could easily reach 1500, some even as high as 1600. It was all bullshit to begin with, long before the reference 480 was even released.

It's chinese whispers. It gets repeated often enough that eventually it's nothing like what was originally said.

>>55699733
Nothing every suddenly turned into 1350, retard, it was always 1350 because 1335 is what you achieve if you don't bother to optimize anything. That's dragging the slider across at stock voltages level of overclock.

>>55699690
Try pretty much every DX11 game i have.
280X would gain about 3-4FPS when overclocked, 480 gains about 3-4FPS when overclocked.

>AMD’s latest driver automatically overrides Sapphire’s tuned fan profile which results in ridiculously fast fan speeds above 2300RPM. Apparently, it’s because AMD targeted a 65C delta instead of 75C which the Sapphire model’s cooling apparatus is based upon.

The card was trying to reach 65C but still shows 75C when tested. What?

>>55699773
> In the grand scheme of things, going from 1266MHz to 1340MHz is a rather small overclock of 6%. You aren't going to see a big gaming benefit from that. When we bumped the frequency up to 1345-1350MHz is when artifacts started appearing on the screen in games randomly from time to time. At 1355MHz the artifacts were more frequent and distracting from playing the game. At 1365MHz artifacting was extremely bad and the games locked up.

>To play with no artifacts on the screen, 1340MHz was the highest, and that is with the fan at a very loud volume. If you wanted to overclock with the fan at a quiet volume, you will probably be out of luck. We noticed this GPU gets hot fast when overclocking with the fan at default fan speed. We experienced our GPU reaching 90c in no time and throttling the GPU clock speed when trying to overclock past 1.3GHz with default fan profile and +50% Power Limit.

>>55699264
The article you linked gave a glowing recommendation.

He also stated there was no reason to buy a 1060 for more, when this product is less.

Nice damage control, shill

>>55699773
>280X would gain about 3-4FPS when overclocked
Now I know you're lying. I've got a 280, and the difference on Witcher 3 between stock clock @ 933Mhz and OC @ 1125Mhz is around 13fps.

>>55699661
>bigger framerate jump than my old 280X did going all the way up to 1200mhz
because a 280x is already an overclcoked 7970

Why does no one bench games people actually play? like TF2?

>>55699797
>all this bullshit text
I own one, faggot. 1350 is achievable if you tweak the voltages correctly (including undervolting the VRAM) and the GPU reaches 90c only if you let it by keeping the default fan profile, which refuses to actually go up to 100% at any point, preferring to thermal throttle.

At 1335mhz (my normal overclock), my fan never goes above 50% and the temps stay below 85c.

With a tiny little blower and a chunk of aluminium.

>>55699806
Even with that "glowing recommendation" that article is still shit. Tomorrow your going to see them show a 2ghz clock on a 1060 and shill it implying that that isn't a absolute gold sample.

>>55699831
>I could get 1350 MHz so everyone can get 1350 MHz!
what is binning

>>55699824
Because TF2 runs on my grandmother's toaster.

>>55699810
So a 192 MHz gave you 13fps?

And 74mhz gives 4fps on the 480?

How is this a huge issue, again ?

>>55699810
Something is fucked up with your setup then, because going 1050mhz > 1200mhz with my 280X the absolute best i saw was like 6FPS improvement in Anno 2205.

>>55699831
You're assuming every card has won the silicon lottery. The majority of cards struggle to maintain stable clocks at 1310mhz.

>>55699846
Something that doesn't matter with the stock 6-pin, but might become important now that power and cooling is being added.

>>55699873
no they don't
see >>55699240
its a reference board 290x

>>55699856
But is any card capable of pushing 289fps at the highest setting at 1440p?
Until that day no card is good enough.

>>55699858
You claimed that your 280X only gained 3-4 fps when going to 1200 MHz.

>>55699885
>Something that doesn't matter with the stock 6-pin
Of course it matters. Are you retarded?

>>55699892
He's talking about 480, not 290X.

>>55699862
>best i saw was like 6FPS
I would say there's something fucked up with your setup if that's all you're getting.

>>55699862
FPS gain depends on how high your fps is in the first place. Say you have 100% OC scaling, so 10% OC leads to 10% higher fps. At 30 fps, that's 3 extra fps. At 60 fps, that's 6 extra fps, etc.

>tried to warn AMDummies that the 480 overclocks like shit as a design flaw that the aibs would never fix
>they called me a shill

who is laughing now, AMDumbs?

>>55699907
Its the same throughout, reviewers said the 7970, 290x, fury x and now 480 cant overclock. They are all shills, AMD cards all overclock great.

>>55699895

Different dude here

>>55699936
>AMD doesn't overclock
See >>55699240

and fuck off to /v/
>>>/v/

>>55699941
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_7970/31.html

>Maximum stable clocks of our card are 1075 MHz core (16% overclock) and 1715 MHz Memory (25% overclock).

>Both overclocks are spectacular. It's amazing to see over 15% overclocking potential on a brand-new GPU design, using a brand new production process. Over 1700 MHz memory clock is actually the highest memory speed we have ever seen!

Why do you lie?

>>55699952
He said that 480 doesn't overclock, not that AMD cards in general don't oveclock, genius.

>>55699961
Its a lie and i bet if i had a 480 i could easily get it to 1.5 ghz, also they all are on GCN arch

>>55699936
The review said there was little reason to buy a 1060fe when this card is cheaper. It's a recommendation, shill

>>55699980
AMDrones making big claims again and when they will be proven wrong they will call falseflaging again. You fags said the reference could reach 1.5 Ghz and we all know that POS can't OC at all.

>>55700026
It can just all the reviewers are retarded shills and so are you

>>55699597
>Gets caught posting a gif of bad airflow and lying about how it's the Nitro's airflow
>Resorts to memes
Better luck next time, shill!

>>55699842
>Quotes an article as proof for his claim without bothering to read it
>Someone mentions that article actually recommends the 480
>Suddenly the article is shit
Not a good day for nVidia shills, I see.

>>55699477
>card reaches 75C with fans at 2.3k
>"T-That's how it's supposed to be a-anon."

>wow boutiful grephiks carts
autism that can't be cured

>>55700145
>fans at 2.3k
wut?

>>55700145
You can thank its shitty design and the way it uses hot air to cool the card.

>>55699216
shitposting aside, I was actually looking forward to the nitro but sadly saphire
decided to go full retard in the great caliphate of europe and price it at ridiculous 320 euros.

I can get my hands on an aib 1060 for 280-300 right fucking now so sadly novidya outjewed amd once again

atleast there is still hope for sick dx12/vulkan gains in the future

>>55700175
320Euros is stock XFX price.

>>55700167
The fans were at 2.3k rpm and the GPU at 75C you silly you

>>55699370
Yeah. I'm calling bullshit on either the graph or the benchmarking method.

>>55700175
How much is the 390X? Stock 390X is faster than the Nitro, and there's still room to OC the 390X some more.

>>55700113
Im not a nvidia shill, im saying that they couldn't even be bothered to overclock the 480 so its a shit article while the same site will prob show a 2ghz 1060 and shill for that as being obtainable

>>55700238
>Im not a nvidia shill
Nice try. I'm not falling for that again.

>>55700233
they both overclock

>>55700211
PCWorld review never said what RMP card goes and it said that only once did the fans go to audible level.

where you got the RMP numbers from?

>>55700248
read the post you retard

my 480 barely overclocks to 20mhz, not sure why these idiots are saying this is a shill

you morons bought into FUD about it ocing to insane numbers and believed it now everyone saying otherwise must be bought by novidia

unless I'm being reverse shilled or something by nvidiots claiming this card can do unbelievable shit just so I can get disappointed and mad

Guys. The card needs more mV which Wattman is not supplying. Sapphire Trixx 3.0 will allow a higher voltage. To get past 1400 you need about 1.2v

That is why they have not been able to clock it higher.

>>55700281
first of all, silicon(e) lottery.
and need to ask you this, do you know what the fuck are you doing?

>>55700296
Sorry I think I got the version wrong. Anyhow you need Trixx to overvolt it properly.

>>55700250
>[citation needed]
Provide a review that proves the Nitro OC's and I'll believe you.

Protip: You can't!

File: jew2_3463462.jpg (42KB, 491x491px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 491x491px

>>55699461
What the fuck is that gif supposed to be? Hot air doesn't go downwards spontaneously like that. Especially if you have a bottom intake fan there's no way that could happen.

File: 42876.png (33KB, 611x574px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 611x574px

>>55700258
At least read the link provided and then shill as hard as you can

>>55700308
if it really oc'd to 1600mhz or something then no matter how unlucky I get I doubt I'd get one binned to only oc 20mhz

Who cares about 10mhz oc, you cant buy this shit for another month

Another
Month
Delay

redifined the term paperlaunch with this one, it puts goyvidia to shame

>>55700326
>if it really oc'd to 1600mhz
It doesn't, and it never will. It was a baseless rumor started before the reference 480 was launched.

>>55700317
there are two link, there are 2 reviews.

>>55699980
Shut up you shill. You are nothing but a nVidia shill trying to downplay the RX480. It will reach 1.6+Ghz on golden chips. Every single chip will reach 1.5Ghz easily.

>>55700281
you dont have a 480 stop shilling

File: Garak_collapses.jpg (38KB, 576x432px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 576x432px

**** JUST TO MAKE IT CLEAR ****

TO OVERCLOCK THIS PAST 1400Mhz YOU WILL NEED THE NEW SAPPHIRE TRIXX TOOL OR SOMETHING THAT CAN PUSH THE VOLTAGE PAST 1.2V AS IT IS LOCKED OUT IN WATTMAN AND IN THE CARD OTHERWISE!

A bit of a pain but there you go. Yes Housefires. But those are the breaks.

>>55700326
>http://www.3dmark.com/spy/17356

here is highest I could find.

File: baseless lies.png (107KB, 904x771px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 904x771px

>>55700326
It will never reach those clocks.
http://www.overclock.net/t/1603252/wccf-amd-rx-480-can-hit-1-5ghz-new-overclocking-tool-with-voltage-control-coming/390#post_25267966

>>55699411
>being this fucking retarded

>>55699324
nice meme
ocuk will start selling them starting tomorrow and they have a self-reported 2k on stock

>>55700343
I knew that before I even bought one, still, even with low expectations I didn't expect my 480 to be this much of a turd. The 20mhz oc is barely even stable too, and the FPS seem way off what reviewers put it at. Then again I bought this as a poorfag card and I'm not gayming with an 8 core i7

>>55700386
You will not find a higher clock because of silicon lottery and needing stupid cooling plus hardware ic connector.

Best case overclock on air is gonna be 1450Mhz but it will require more than 1.2v (see post above).

>>55700175

>check my usual store
>8gb nitro at 329€
>4gb one at 257€

Sadly I bet this time they are actual 4gb, no unlocking shenanigans

>>55700317
>150W card
>those temps
>that fan speed
How?

>>55700424
PCWorld uses 4gb model, if you are playing in 1440p/1080p you really don't need more.

>>55700413
you are probably correct on this one, just wanted to show that 480 has potential for good OC.

>>55700445
>480
>1440p
yeah... no

>>55700445

Pcworld images are not loading for me. I only game at 1080p, but I worry on how will it handle future heavier fills, especially since I like to mod my games to hell and back. How badly (or not) did it fall behind on higher resolutions?

>>55700445
>1440p
Only if you think 30fps is good.

>>55700480
I know this for a fact because my current R9 290 won't overclock to it's potential unless I *HAVE TO* use Trixx (I think Afterburner can do it too). Wattman is power limited.

>>55700524
is this birth of new epic maymay?

Was planning on getting this to replace my reference 7950 because I can't stand the heat and noise anymore. Should I still bother with this or just get a 1060? All I need is 1080p/60fps

So basically

>aib 480 comes out
>doesn't overclock well
>costs £30-40 more than the cheapest aib 1060

Why should I buy this again?

>>55700634
Do you wanna wait 3-4 weeks until this maybe hits the market?

File: 1410397838490.gif (2MB, 390x205px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 390x205px

>>55700663
there's that to, is there even an actually date for this thing? I'm tired of all the waiting...

>tfw AIB1060 is cheaper than a 480 reference where i live

What the fuck were they thinking?

>>55700641
if you don't you're an nvidia shill who belongs on >>>/v/

My R9 290 @ 1100/1500 scores 4144 and graphics score 4019 on a i7 4770K @ 4.2Ghz just for comparison. It still beats the GTX 1060 reference in that respect. But it's also noisy, hot and a power consuming beast!

>>55700724
because the 480 is the superior card stupid asshole nvidiot

>>55700493

Anything lads? I am in the dark right now.

>>55700845
modded skyrim routinely uses up more than 4gb of vram so take that for what it's worth

>no release date
>no benchmarks
>no reviews
>no price

Wow it's fucking nothing. Just wait guys, am i rite

>>55700724

Your shithole country doesn't matter?

>>55699076
4gb version u mong

>>55699281
nigga the fans dont even turn on until 50C

>>55700924

The big question is if the 480 has the horsepower to take advantage of the larger vram size.
4 vs. 8gb is a moot point if by the time it finally fills 4 the game is already a choppy unplayable mess.

File: nitro-480-gpu-temp-100673205-large.png (71KB, 580x948px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 580x948px

>buying a housefire 1060

kek

File: untitled-3.png (59KB, 683x1025px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 683x1025px

>>55701077
amdrone status: rekt

>>55701077

>dual fans
>only -3c cooler than the blower-style 1060

oh my gosh

>>55701077
Same as my R9 290 under load and overclocked. just doing some more testing to compare against The Nitro+ OC and GTX 1060. I basically have around the same results in Firestrike as a boost clocked GTX 1060. The Nitro+ OC is a bit better than my OC'd GPU but not by much. Of course that's just synthetic benchmarks and my GPU uses more power (My fans are also hella noisy and suffer from bad coil whine).

File: nitro-480-gpu-temp-oc-100673231-large.png (46KB, 580x949px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 580x949px

>>55701135
what i cant hear you, your housefire is too loud

:^)

>>55699749
You do realise that Hitman is AMD optimised, do you?

>>55701135
I don't care much about temps. Power usage is also less of a concern (Unless it's ludicrous). All I care about is price and performance

File: 4gb.png (46KB, 580x948px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 580x948px

>4gb amd card beating 6gb nvida

topkek nvidia on suicide watch

>>55700175
this. hate it so much. really wanted this card, but now I'm eyeing with the 1060 instead. although their AIBs mostly look shit. call me a fagit, but I want my card to match the rest of my rig.

>>55701250
the 480 nitro is better

>>55701201
To be fair that is a non-OC'd 1060. It beats the 480 when OC'd with less power draw. Of course the Nitro+ OC is not overclocking nearly as well as it should because it's voltage limited. We still need to see what it can do using Sapphire Trixx to push the mV (Not sure if Afterburner can do it someone will need to test). I do expect it to break 1400Mhz with a 1.2v boost but then temps will no doubt go up a bit too without a custom profile.

>>55701277
m8, stop, im trying to b8 fanbois

>>55699367
neither the ones on my trixx fury but it still idles at 33C and hits 65 @ load

>>55701175
>3C lesss than stock 1060

jesus christ what are sapphire smoking over there

even the single fan evga 1060 barely gets over 70C

>>55701327
its all about the dB my friendo

>>55701277
>To be fair that is a non-OC'd 1060. It beats the 480 when OC'd with less power draw.
50 nvidia points have been deposited to your account

>>55701277
>wait for 480
>wait for non ref models
>wait for voltage control
>wait for optimizations it'll pull ahead
>just w8 m8 it'll get better

Do amd users ever get tried of waiting?

The 1060 is all that and more and is available right now.

>>55699012
I'm still using a PowerColour 7950 about 3 years later and it still works fine. But I regret not selling it for $400 during all the Bitcoin hype a few years ago.

>>55701356
I have to wait anyways, to see if RX480 will work in Sierra.

>>55701356
>wait for maxwell
>wait for 780 ti
>wait for pascal
>wait for 300 series
>wait for fermi

do nvidiots ever get tied of waiting?

File: 1348330333579.png (490KB, 449x401px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 449x401px

>>55701356
>1060
>available

>>55701356
cant find any stock t͏bh fa͏milia

>>55701356
>available right now.

HA

File: vcvvlUe.png (17KB, 506x292px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 506x292px

>>55701356
>for like 8 months

>>55701356
it is all out of stock here

>>55701277
the 480 is never going to be a good card, it's time to move on

hopefully vega or whatever isn't so much of a bust

>>55701469
>the 480 is never going to be a good card
ok its time to go back now
>>>/v/

>>55701540
Not that guy but can you stop spamming that in every single thread?

I don't know what you're trying to accomplish but it's not working.

>>55701647
Go back to /v/, you aren't welcome here
>>>/v/

>>55701657
Spamming is against the rules. You are literally spamming. The archive is full of your shit for the past few days.

Is there a significant difference in performance between 480 and 1060 ? I'm on gtx 760 now and will probably get the cheapest of the two in my country

>>55701736

Same boat as you, I'm >>55700424
If the performance loss on the 4gb 480 is minimal, I'll go for it, 260€ for an aib is not bad at all

>>55701425
these kind of things interest me, the apparent retention of power in AMD cards and improvements over times, but is it tested in the same rigs with the same processors?

what brands are good on the nvidia side? is Palit any good?

>>55701936
palit = pny. pny make quadro cards for nvidia so they're reliable.

>>55701975
Palit is a Taiwanese company.
PNY is an American company.

>>55701695
And you have autism
>>>/v/
fuck off and never come back

>>55702007
they are the same company under different names. pny sells their products in american and palit does in east asia and europe. they're the same company.

>>55701736
RX 480 Nitro

>>55702032
Strange how in UK we get both then.

>>55702032
Going to need a citation on that.

And I see PNY products in yurop.

>>55702076
https://www.reddit.com/r/buildapc/comments/21tiho/discussion_why_does_nobody_care_about_palit_video/

palit also owns gainward

http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20050201A7036.html

>>55698950
>>55701175
>using the smiley with a carat nose

>>55698950
Next week retard

>>55700315
Actually the negative pressure created by the fans on top of the card would cause something like that, but nothing extreme.

>>55702199
I wouldn't consider a random reddit post a trustworthy source.

Wikipedia says absolutely nothing about PNY being related to Palit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PNY_Technologies

File: gluten free.jpg (62KB, 1079x598px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 1079x598px

DELEETE EVERYTHING

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUKUSTJUSTJSUTJSUT

JUST

LOSS

1
2
3
4


1 2
3 4

1
2
34


FUCK IT ALL RAHHH ROOO

>>55702659
>I wouldn't consider a random reddit post a trustworthy source.
>Wikipedia says
>Wikipedia say
>Wikipedia sa
>Wikipedia s
>Wikipedia

hahaha

>>55701356
Just wait for VEGA ;^)

>>55704863
Wikipedia tends to have these things called references at the bottom of the page. Perhaps you've heard of them before.

>>55699076
>4GB
>quiet bios not stock OC'd one
yeah no