Why doesn't Linux let you run .exe files from any arbitrary

just chuck your binary file into /usr/bin or run it anywhere with ./program

>>55687910
But what if I don't want it in /usr/bin?

>>55687940
Use Windows

>>55687940
Then read the fucking reply all the way through and gas yourself

>>55687970
>>55687958
>>55687940
>>55687910
>>55687815
jesus christ everyone here is retarded.

this thread is obvious bait, and if you cant see that, off yourself please.

I fell for it.

export PATH=$PATH:.

>>55687815
>Why doesn't Linux let you run .exe files from any arbitrary directory like Windows?
But it does?
>Why doesn't it use DLL files? DLL files are nice. You just download them and chuck them in system32 and forget about them.
Because we don't want shit like winSxS

>>55687815
please just kill yourself and end the misery

>>55687970
I don't want to run it with ./program. I want the actual files to be somewhere else. I don't want to use a stupid shortcut.

>>55688005
>winsxs
>wow64
>wow32
>/system32(64)
puke

>>55687940
add your prefered directory to the $PATH environment variable

>Why doesn't it use DLL files?
They're called .so instead of .dll

>>55688245
And then you can run executables from that directory?

That's still not as good as being able to put them anywhere and just click on em...

>>55688318
you can still do that without modifying $PATH

I know you're trolling, but how lazy are you?

>>55688028
>use Windows
>sign up for disability for your autism.

Problem solved.

>>55688028
just double click on the binary