What's the best Linux distro and why? I'm using Ubuntu

File: 1468942017557s.jpg (5KB, 157x157px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 157x157px

You're already using the best. Congratulations.

File: 1453694583117.png (260KB, 563x542px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 563x542px

>>55662832
This

well memed

File: 1468816651740.jpg (42KB, 790x820px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 790x820px

Install *BSD

Fedora

god damn i love pepe Dx

up

>>55662827
Arch/KDE for desktop, xubuntu for laptop, CentOS for servers

>>55664107
lmao you bumped this thread? why?

>>55664124
/thread

File: 1441818300114.jpg (2MB, 1224x1632px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1224x1632px

>>55662827
I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Linux”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU project.

There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called “Linux” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

>>55664509
wut

>>55665420
huh?

>>55662911
this u guys

>>55662911
This or manjaro. I personally go for Manjaro because Fedora feels more like a work environment, while Manjaro feels more comfy.

i rather use apt-get than pacman

>>55665656
that's understandable, but pacman is actually really good when it's not on Arch. Arch is the problem, like always.

I don't know but it's not Mint.
It's probably Ubuntu if you change the ugly default desktop environment

File: Screenshot from 2016-07-20 16-32-09.jpg (366KB, 3440x1440px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 3440x1440px

>>55662827
Manjaro Gnome of course

Linux Mint, because it makes Linux accessible to everyone while giving them options, unlike Shitbuntu which comes with Unity aka ebola.

>>55665671
What's the problem with Arch? I haven't had any problems with it

>>55666126
For me to constantly fucks itself.

>>55662827
its easier to just change the de/wm only difference in distros are package managers and what default packages they have

File: 1468761958352-g.jpg (69KB, 540x721px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 540x721px

>>55662827
Xubuntu, Debian, and Opensuse Tumbleweed. Arch is a meme. Gentoo is the only true bleeding edge distro compiling packages right from source.

>>55662897
>ifunny

>>55662827
>>55662832
>>55662842
>>55662897
>>55664675
>>55664944
>>55665871
>>55667305

dumb frogposters

>>55662827
used ubuntu 1st, gnome
switched to fedora, gnome
then work pushed KDE, so went to KDE neon
then tried Kubuntu

I use a dock and 3 monitors from a laptop... something that most distros aren't naively capable of (bugs, bugs everywhere).

currently using mint cinnamon, so very pleasantly surprised. issues persist, as it's still linux, but I can work with this.