Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: 9782634859.jpg (123KB, 1000x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
123KB, 1000x1000px
Tell me why I shouldn't use a 4K telly as my PC monitor /g/
>curved 4K at +40", big enough to use at native resolution without scaling
>3840x2160 @ 60hz with full 4:4:4 reproduction over HDMI
>contrast of ~5000:1
>21ms response time in gayming mode
>supports cool features when not in gayming mode, like judder reduction and resolution/fps upscaling
>>
Saturated flawed colors. Only looks good looking at crap tv signal.
>>
>21ms response time
Enjoy your input lag you filthy casual
>>
>>55635533
>21ms response time
That's why.
>>
>21ms response time
wow that's just terrible
add input lag to that and you'll have 60 ms of shit
>>
>>55635821
>>55636146
>>55636171
Not Op, but TV lag/responce times make it really hard to buy a living room TV to play my PC games on at a distance.
Is there a single good low latency TV?
>>
>>55635533
Probably the same reason you wouldn't use an HDTV a few years ago.
Dot pitch.
>>
Serious question now? Why is 4k only 2160? That's like saying 1080p is 2k.
Is it all marketing? If it is why are we going with it? What will we call true 4k displays?
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (271KB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
271KB, 1920x1080px
>21m
>60hz
>>
>>55635533
Do what you like man, if it doesn't work just stop using it.
Why do you need our reassurance.
>>
>>55637496
Because whoever thought of it is an advertiser, and a moron. Yes, marketing.
>>
>>55637496
>That's like saying 1080p is 2k.
In film production, 2048x1080 has been called 2k for a long time.
Thread posts: 12
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2