https://www.techpowerup.com/downloa ds/2739/techpowerup-gpu-z-v1-9-0

enjoy your 3.5 GB

>>55556574
OP is talking about the monitoring software, not the card.

>>55556574
You too, thanks.

File: tmp_28266-1467149978960-253499793.jpg (19KB, 550x343px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 550x343px

>Revision: A1

File: Capture.png (33KB, 392x482px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 392x482px

For some reason I was still running version 0.8.8.

File: lol.gif (27KB, 529x607px)

27KB, 529x607px

>>55556508
>ASIC Quality: 80.3%
>Your card's ASIC Quality is higher than 78.7% of similar GPUs in our validation database.

Not sure how to feel about this.

>>55556984
Indifferent. It doesn't really mean anything.

>>55557302
This. I sold my 85.1% ASIC GTX 780 a couple of weeks ago and it was an extremely mediocre overclocker, even with a custom BIOS that removed any kind of power or voltage shackles.

File: Untitled.png (64KB, 979x603px)

64KB, 979x603px

Neat

File: ss+(2016-07-13+at+12.42.39).png (85KB, 798x492px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 798x492px

>>55556508
cool i guess.

File: Screenshot_20160713-133813.png (266KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 720x1280px

>>55556508
That versioning
> inb4 next version is 3.14

GPU related question. I currently game on a quadro fx 1800. How big of a jump would an 8gb reference 480 be?

>>55559154
It'd be a gigantic leap, to the point that even comparing them would silly. Although it would of course depend on your CPU too. If you're running a C2D or something then it won't be worth it.

>>55559302
Xeon x5570. Is it worth the extra for a AIB if I don't plan to push the card to the limit?

File: always dubs.jpg (12KB, 188x200px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 188x200px

>>55555555

>>55559397
Depends on how sensitive you are to noise really. The custom cards will certainly run quieter and cooler, even at stock.

File: Capture.png (53KB, 833x515px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 833x515px

1570mhz @ 1.187v

>>55559608
The quadro has a blower cooler and i hear the HDD more than I do it, even at 90%.

File: gpu2.png (45KB, 765x479px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 765x479px

>>55559670
1600mhz @ 1.23v

File: gpuz.png (46KB, 774x488px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 774x488px

Wow, I was using like 0.8 something.

>>55560404
>>55559670
>>55560501
>GDDR5 (Samsung)
Based Samsung overclocking.

File: 123548967.png (93KB, 778x472px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 778x472px

Is this good? Does it mean I can further OC my card?

>>55561673
I wouldn't even bother overclocking that beast of a board, an HD7900 anything is better than those pos consoles.

>>55561673
You should be able to add another 100-150MHz to the core with no effort whatsoever.

File: gpuz.gif (37KB, 598x754px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 598x754px

>>55557644
Sup fury bro