STOP RIGHT THERE We've received reports about underutilized

>>55513052
>chrome
sage this shit

File: running-fox-hd-photos-4[1].jpg (61KB, 550x367px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 550x367px

>>55513235
>can i see your underutilized cor' OH SHI
GET ON THE GROUND

File: attachment[1].jpg (656KB, 1600x1140px) Image search: [Google]

656KB, 1600x1140px

>>55513692
suspect neutralized. lol cant even run fast with 1 thread.

File: aswqa.png (29KB, 688x278px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 688x278px

>>55513052

Why aren't they accelerated?

File: image.png (106KB, 727x581px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 727x581px

My GPU is working hard non-stop to render the contents of the world wide web. :^)

>>55513052
STOP RIGHT HERE YOU CRIMINAL SCUM

File: kek.png (51KB, 965x899px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 965x899px

>>55513052
But I am!

>>55513052
>chrome
>not using firefox which utilizes gpu everything by default

>>55513833
>Firefox

How do people still use this poorly made piece of shit past version 16 and take pride in it?

Holy fuck I'd rather use Edge.

File: gpu.chrome.png (46KB, 631x338px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 631x338px

I fully utilize my 980 playin vydia at 5670x1080

>>55513862
>Edge
>Hardware acceleration

It can't even decide which GPU to use.

File: about:performance.png (14KB, 549x108px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 549x108px

>>55513862
but firefox is the best!!!

File: cS45swrlrTJijH1RblBLe8LlW2p.jpg (732KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

732KB, 1920x1080px

>>55513896
try this and post again
"C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe" --enable-native-gpu-memory-buffers --disable-gpu-driver-bug-workarounds

>>55513762
You can enable gpu rasterization in chrome:flags. From what I've read gpumemorybuffers option is only for chromeOS.

>>55513052
>implying I'm not using integrated graphics

File: chrome_gpu.png (36KB, 604x342px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 604x342px

>>55513969
doesn't work dude

File: 1457307533571.png (43KB, 209x205px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 209x205px

>>55514092
:D

>>55513052
These madVR filter won't run on any ole card

File: _904-.png (61KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 256x256px

>>55514113
What GPU are you using??? r9 290x here

>>55513896
buffers and rasterization is disabled on mine as well. should i even bother enabling it?

File: 12d.jpg (31KB, 567x561px)

31KB, 567x561px

>>55514139
nvidia gt425m a laptop made in 2010. no worries, im sure you are having a better browsing experience in general.

File: The Matrix (1999).mp4_snapshot_02.06.42_[2016.07.09_20.24.28].jpg (133KB, 1920x796px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 1920x796px

>>55514144
GET ON THE FUCKING GROUND

File: problems.png (56KB, 688x288px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 688x288px

>>55514164
ok. just weird that I can't enable it. I noticed there is an entry in the problems detected saying it's been disabled through command line. even tried enabling "Zero-copy rasterizer" and still doesn't turn green.

File: JPEG_20160628_183522.jpg (382KB, 736x1042px) Image search: [Google]

382KB, 736x1042px

>>55513052
But with my vydia (amd 290), chrome becomes extremely slow and laggy when hardware acceleration turned on. So i can only browse web with full software rendering, or firefox. That's sad, i know.

File: Screenshot 2016-07-10 at 8.30.38 PM.png (35KB, 578x261px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 578x261px

shit

File: Sgt.Hartman[1].png (120KB, 300x268px)

120KB, 300x268px

>>55514388
kek'd
what clusterfuck is this anon. fix this shit and report back ASAP

>>55514425
its a chromebook mate, i have no idea how to deal with the little nvidia tegra 3 in here

File: Screenshot_20160710_213811.png (37KB, 579x239px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 579x239px

>>55513052
dindu nuffin

File: are you from the NSA.jpg (92KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1366x768px

>>55513052
>canvas
>flash
>video
>webgl

I try to avoid having any of those things show up in my browser, hardware accelerated or not.

File: 13423818_590222644485078_6480198051143923617_n.jpg (9KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 320x180px

>>55514502
chrome.exe" --enable-native-gpu-memory-buffers --disable-gpu-driver-bug-workarounds --flag-switches-begin --force-gpu-rasterization --num-raster-threads=4 --disable-features=AutomaticTabDiscarding --flag-switches-end

>>55514528
>.exe

>>55514360
I notice scrolling lag if a 1080p60fps livestream is open in another tab. However if I open up a separate browser window the scroll lag disappears.

File: 11219593_10153343245106060_6795527242057353864_n.jpg (96KB, 640x640px)

96KB, 640x640px

>>55514549
just run it with those switches niglett. I like all operating systems.

>>55514565
dont worry we all have that scroll lag. that's the cost of fully utilizing your gpu.

>>55514590
cool thx. Good to know, I was worried it was some kind of amd driver issue.

>>55514565
Not only scrolling, it even freezes when opening new tab or showing alert popup. h264/webm video runs smooth and fast n true 1080p@60 no matter what, but interface perfomance drops out to unusable level.
I'm got exhausted fighting this shit and just switched to firefox. Still have no solution or even reasonable explatation tho. It's odd, i know.

>>55513964
>>55513862
>>55513901
Sjw fox

File: hp9x4.jpg (46KB, 460x348px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 460x348px

>>55514724

>>55514875
>le sjw fox meme

Meanwhile at Google..
http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/11/03/google-grants-racial-justice/75096508/

File: 3qfzt0.jpg (51KB, 395x568px)

51KB, 395x568px

>Native GpuMemoryBuffers: Software only. Hardware acceleration disabled
Rasterization: Software only. Hardware acceleration disabled
>Some drivers are unable to reset the D3D device in the GPU process sandbox

Edge is the only one using our GPU's properly.

>>55513718

I didn't realize this was an ATF thread.

File: 1467500233794.jpg (204KB, 760x1024px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 760x1024px

>>55515638
enable natve gpu buffers if u wanna use intel gpu
enable gpu rasterization but dont force it, because chrome uses cpu when the page has a lot of text because cpu rasterizes text faster than gpu

File: Screenshot_20160710-224731.png (451KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

451KB, 1440x2560px

Goddam Qualcomm fucking everything up again

is it better to use GPU for canvas? I switched it to CPU cause it's faster. Seeing everyone using GPU makes me feel a little left out but then again none of you use browser the way I do so I should be fine

>>55513052
Don't worry, I'm using my GPU to mine bitcoin as we speak.

File: 1461196341100.jpg (171KB, 682x1024px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 682x1024px

>>55516111
try disabling zero copy rasterizer and use gpu
>>55516243
good boy