I'm looking to get a new smartphone with a very good camera,

That photo looks like shit and there's no such thing as a "really good cellphone camera."

I think you should bought the samsung galaxy s7 or the Sony z5, they have really good cameras

>>55507149
I don't expect high MP from a smartphone camera. Whats good about the photo I posted is that there is very little noise due to the camera's f/1.7 aperture lens making it capable of taking low-light photos. I don't think the S7 can be beaten as far as low-light photos because thats thew lowest aperture I've found in my research, but there are a lot of other specifications out there than just low aperture that can make a camera good.

>>55507191

You fell for the marketing buzzwords so fucking hard m8.

>high MP
>f/1.7
>noise

As a matter of fact, all smartphone cameras have "high megapickels" because they know that sells phones, even though high megapixels are shit when the sensor is so small.

There's a fuckload of noise in that shot you posted, too, and it's oversharpened like crazy.

Aperture doesn't make the camera.

>touchwizz

>>55507249
I have a Nexus 5x and an pretty impressed with its camera.