Let's rank programming languages by good vs evil and lawful

File: motto.png (379KB, 440x1446px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 440x1446px

Still reconsidering the Chaotic good and Neutral evil choices though.

>>55472782
>ADA
i am pretty sure the american disabilities act is not a P.R.O.G.R.A.M.M.I.N.G. L.A.N.G.U.A.G.E.

>>55472782
Now I know why I like C so much...my life goal is to be like Perl or Haskell

Those evil choices are also alarmingly accurate (Java and C++ in particular)

File: tumblr.jpg (27KB, 452x254px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 452x254px

>>55472782
>no node
DROPPED

Lawful evil: Python
Neutral evil: Common Lisp
Chaotic evil: PHP

Lawful Neutral: Java
True Neutral: JavaScript
Chaotic Neutral: C

Lawful good: Clojure
Neutral good: Ruby
Chaotic good: Perl

>>55474543
>neutral good
>Ruby
>good
DROPPED

(I believe the evil rankings though)

File: Bug density.png (73KB, 800x664px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 800x664px

>>55474747
It's primary goal is literally to make developers happy, and has one of the lowest bug densities of any language.

If that's not good, I don't know what is.

anything on the good side is pretty subjective, but the evil is on point

This thread is so fucking stupid. How the fuck do you rank programming languages on those completely unrelated axis?

Fuck off, OP.

>>55474797
Subjectively!

There isn't much point, besides it's kinda fun to do.

>>55474842
kys

>>55474788
To be fair, I may have been traumatized by rails at uni. I'll have to evaluate ruby again sometime. Still don't like the gems thing though, and the way colons are used...

>>55474884
Oh, old Rails is a horrible place to start with it.

I think it's best to play around in a REPL like Pry to get a better idea about the language in general. It allows you to navigate your namespace like a filesystem. (So you can "cd" into variables, "ls" to see members, run functions like commands, and pull documentation)

Also, if you put "binding.pry" somewhere in your code after requiring pry, you can use it like a debugger, or to run any code from any context ever. You can basically put it at the end of an incomplete function to experiment and build a bridge as you are crossing it, Lisp-style.

Also, method chaining on collections is the shit.

File: Commit Sudoku.png (28KB, 450x540px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 450x540px

>>55474876

BEST: javascript es6.

File: 1467984035877.png (1KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 250x250px

>>55472782
OP, your image was incorrect. I fixed that for you.

File: 2784wctnpo.jpg (24KB, 400x266px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 400x266px

>>55474999
Not anon, but I see what you did there. Cheeky...

>>55474999
top kek

>>55474999
Filename was sort of a giveaway.

File: i.png (3KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 250x250px

>>55475091

>>55472782
>(((((((((good

File: BuJ_uQACYAATIh9.png (121KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 400x400px

>>55476175
It is though.

>>55474788
that study was all kinds of flawed. You're making a fool of yourself by using that graph

>>55477881
Slightly flawed perhaps, but still reasonable and it shows an interesting correlation: https://labs.ig.com/static-typing-promise

>((((((Common Lisp)))))))
>((((((((((((((good)))))))))))))))))