Why isn't razorqt as popular as lxde, xfce, or mate? It

For some reason it's using much more ram in this chart, but on my pc at home it's only using 340MB on boot, Ubuntu mate uses ~300 to 310MB on boot.

File: cmp-all4.png (32KB, 698x690px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 698x690px

>>55465807
Forgot pic

>razor-qt
Razor-qt is dead, try lxqt instead

Nice vaporware op

>>55465968
Really? I thought it was great though...

What's the differences between lxqt and lxde?

>>55465824
from when is this chart?
i see a lot of i3 latly...

>>55465993
https://l3net.wordpress.com/2013/03/17/a-memory-comparison-of-light-linux-desktops/

Here's the link to the original article, it's 3 pages long, but worth the read.

>>55465991
It's basically the same thing desu, the devs merged the projects to make lxqt happen.

>>55465968
lxqt is not unusable but still beat quality.

>>55466140
One thing I don't like about LXDE is that as far as I could tell when I tried it, you could only open the file manager from quick launch.

Is there another way or has that been fixed in lxqt?
I understand lightweight DEs have compromises but some of them are a little annoying imo

>>55466174
lxqt should have the same features as razor-qt, so if razor-qt can change it, lxqt should be able to

File: LXQt_1.png (303KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 1680x1050px

>>55466210
Thanks anon, Just looked up lxqt.

It looks great, I'll give it a try took tonight