I don't really understand S.M.A.R.T. values that well. How

>>55429633
probably 5 more years, unless the mechanical part shits the bed

>>55429633
>80 power-on hours
>174 reallocated sectors
>199 uncorrectable sector count
did you buy a chink knockoff drive from Worston Dogital?

>>55429677
Oh, I got trolled by the the stupid “current” conversions.

The raw values:
>15089 power on hours
>207 reallocated sectors
>325 uncorrectable sectors

If you love your data... get a new disk. I assume that you have have regular backups as well, right?

File: oh shit.png (17KB, 564x348px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 564x348px

>>55429633
How's my driving?

File: Capture.png (23KB, 560x319px)

23KB, 560x319px

>>55429745
food

>>55429677
>>55429726

It was an external hard disk that I stopped using because of bad sectors, then I lost the housing and adapter for it. I just put it internally about 10 minutes ago. Is there any dangers in doing that? Added stress that will make it worse?

>>55429737

It was blank, I had moved everything off it a while back when I first noticed it. Right now im copying some tv shows to test it out and see if the sector allocation gets worse in a few days.

1 hour or 10 years. Who the fuck knows.

>>55429745

What software are you using, i hate Crystal mark.

>>55429889
I recommend

smartctl -x

File: a.png (513KB, 1016x699px) Image search: [Google]

513KB, 1016x699px

What does this mean?!

>>55429889
>i hate Crystal mark.
You need to read the values, they're all the same

>>55429970
>CrystalDiskShit Weeb Edition
It means you belong on >>>/v/

>>55429633
Replace it today, not tomorrow.

>>55429970
https://kb.acronis.com/content/9133

File: Untitled.png (72KB, 674x731px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 674x731px

I did a reset and came back to this, uh oh guys

>>55430371
Go and buy yourself another drive and backup everything now. It looks like it is about to kick the bucket.

>>55430371
see >>55430326

File: 1439058915772.png (92KB, 680x783px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 680x783px

The ultraDMA was caused because of a bad sata cable

File: Cat.jpg (62KB, 437x437px)

62KB, 437x437px

>>55430326
>>55430392

Thanks for the concern guys, but I've actually already done that.

>>55430439
How did you manage to get only 15k hours? Did you dropped it?

>>55429677
WD > Seafail
Fuck off

>>55430461

I don't think so, might have just left it on too much? Not sure if you're supposed to do that with external drives. What's funny is the label said "Enterprise Storage"

>>55430508
>might have just left it on too much
I don't think so, you turned on your pc almost 2x times compared to mine
>>55430371

it's odd

>>55430508
There's something about external drives that hate being left on in my experience.

Better to only plug them in when you are using and disconnect after.

>>55429633
It's dead.

>>55429970
This is probably fine. A weak sector can just happen. I have a Caviar Blue that's been sitting at 4 uncorrectable/2 pending since I got it a year ago, and shuffling blurays to and from it for encoding hasn't move that one bit.

File: Untitled.png (584KB, 1002x816px) Image search: [Google]

584KB, 1002x816px

>>55430501
>WD > Seafail

Ok.

>>55430635
>only 28k power on hours

File: sp2504c.png (82KB, 666x727px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 666x727px

How'd I do lads ?

>>55430501
>post didn't criticize WD
>entire post didn't even mention seagate
uh... okay?