i5 6500: Newer FX 8350- cheaper faster ????? why choose

>>55400037
Nigger are you high? What the fuck?

>>55400037
>/g/ Tries it: Technology

>>55400037
>8350 faster than 6500

Outside of synthetic benchmarks what proof is there to back that up

>>55400091

???

>>55400215

>implying synthetic benchmarks aren't accurate

File: PassMark CPU Performance Comparison.png (42KB, 716x293px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 716x293px

>>55400037
Mainly because people play games like Arma 3 which have horrible multi-core support.

Other than that most people are fine with an FX-8350 or A8 APU if they don't play vydia much. Though I would personally wait for Zen, it could arrive as soon as Q3 2016.

>>55400249
Synthetic benchmarks are the quarter mile times of the tech world, they don't matter in real applications

>>55400037
If you plan on playing CS:GO or Arma III go for intel.

>>55400281
>Synthetic benchmarks are the quarter mile times of the tech world, they don't matter in real applications
Depends on the synthetic benchmark, some are pretty accurate at guaging overall performance like passmark but in the end something like FP64 GFLOPS performance should be used.

>>55400311

Overwatch.

If you guys care, I am designing a white/black build:

http://pcpartpicker.com/list/dbX6XH

>>55400274
Been using a 1055t and 6300 for like years, pretty happy with things hovering around 30 or 40 fps in games and a little above average application performance when softwares like UDK/UE4 supports it.

I mean can't he/she wait for another slow minute to render or process stuff ? Its not like it takes another extra 30min.

Inb4 muh60fps, git fucked kiddo.

>>55400408

Yeah, I don't do any rendering or video editing

I use my 8350 to heat up my apartment in winter

>>55400447

lel just get a hyper 212 evo

e z p z
z
p
z

>>55400467
I do have a good cooler and that is what's making the air outside the computer case hot. If my cooler was shit the heat would stay inside, wouldn't it?

>>55400524

kkk gotcha

>>55400431
>Yeah, I don't do any rendering or video editing
Your machine is still pretty powerful. You could most likely get away with ~20 FPS encoding 720p 10-bit HEVC video.

You should really try it, they've done massive amounts of improvements to the x265 encoder.

Try the most recent one with MEgui or Staxrip from here:

https://builds.x265.eu

I just tried 10-bit x265 1.9+227 encoder and got like 9 FPS on my AMD laptop encoding HEVC video. Pretty noice if you ask me.

>>55400037
>faster
Lol, that's a good one OP.