Thread replies: 5
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: explain please.png (101KB, 1920x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
101KB, 1920x1200px
Someone explain to me why my hottest cores (#3 > 2 > 4 > 1 in that order) are the fastest performers compared to the cooler cores.
Also. I am fucking sick of my core variance. It throws me off hardcore since temp programs always report the hottest core, yet clearly my cooler should be able to keep my chip a lot colder as evidenced by the coldest core. I am thinking about lapping my heatsink and going bare die to see if this alleviates the situation. Any thoughts on this?
Don't be assholes. I'm counting on you /g/
>>
>>55329238
>wet streets cause rain
Idiot.
>>
>>55329263
Fuck off. I'm trying to figure out why there's such a huge discrepancy in performance from core to core. My 4.2ghz overclock is applied to the whole chip. I'm not getting this bullshit.
>>
>>55329301
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/turbo-boost/turbo-boost-technology.html
You didn't even take five minutes to research about your CPU. You fuck off.
>>
>>55329340
It's a good fucking thing I don't use Turboshit and run 4.2Ghz base. I'm able to undervolt the fuck out of my chip at this clockspeed and keep temps down, as you can see from my screenshot, so I am not worried about harming the chip.
I didn't bother researching this because it has nothing to do with my situation.
Thread posts: 5
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1