>visit website >have to click 15 times to make shit usable

just stop using it then faggot, and don't come here and update your blog every time your panties get all bunched up and you get slightly triggered

>>55276726
>privacy is only for pedos

Back to /b/, sonny.

>>55276764
/thread

>>55276776
noscript provides false security. your every click gets recorded by the NSA no matter what

>>55276777
trips have spoken

>>55276789
True, but not by Google, Facebook, and countless other privacy violators. Feels good, man.

Anyway, go back to /b/.

>>55276859
Noscript does not protect you from Google, Facebook and countless other privacy violators either.

>>55276726
It makes old computers and outdated browsers usable.

>>55276726
You could just enable scripts globally and still get the protection

>>55276872
:^)

>>55276890
no

>>55276764
Name one thread that isn't a blog that has ever been made on /g/

File: noscripts.jpg (73KB, 477x640px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 477x640px

>another guy who thinks noscript is stupid
Wow OP, if I wasn't myself, I'd think you and I are the same people shilling to let the FBI spy through your webcam using Google Captcha to make a billboard of all the shots we got of your shriveled penis with a banner that says "OUR MOST ELUSIVE TARGET"

File: NoScriptsUrinal.jpg (212KB, 480x800px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 480x800px

Making fun of noscriptfags is officially a meme.

>>55276776
But it is

>>55276726
Friendly reminder noscript is botnet. Use umatrix instead.

>>55277519
Fuck off, umatrix dev.

>>55277519
Let me guess. It phones home with a hashed, undecipherable unique identifier for NoScript to keep track of the amount of individual users and that somehow compromises your entire secret operation?

You visit maybe 10 sites max on a regular basis. Keep those sites whitelisted, but keep noscript enabled for when grandpa borrows your computer to browse shady russian porn sites.

>>55277482
Can someone explain why he gets into the next urinal?

File: 1322615842122.jpg (26KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 600x600px

>>55277691
... Because he really wants to tell somebody that he has scripts disabled.

>>55276789
The NSA aren't trying to sell me horse shit, or selling my contact info to Pajeets. They aren't bothering me, so I don't care.

Attention NSA guise, I'm about to go jack-off in the bathroom, while viewing femdom pron on my phone. Knock yourselves out, and if any of you happen to be hotties into femdoming, you have my number, know where I live, etc.

>>55277813
Oh for some reason I thought it was because the urinal selection algorithm (maximize total distance from all other urinators) was a javascript but he didn't load it and just ended up in the default spot

uMatrix is much easier to use.

>>55276726
Switch to blacklist mode.

>>55278102
Thay's actually pretty clever

>>55276872
It does if you use it correctly

>>55278102
Give this man a (You)

No script has saved me multiple times from redirector.gvt1.com ads on YouTube that deliver some kind of malicious software.

File: 1371259736165.gif (2MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x240px

>>55278102

>>55276726
more like 1 click for a majority of sites

and you can just turn it off for a particular website altogether, but after doing this you'll quickly realize the value of having it

>>55276726
>2016
>noscript
>not ublocko
brought it on yourself

>>55277234
1
2
34

>>55279967
He should've shit his sister and mother.

>>55279967
Nice blog

nothing really. like you said, it's mostly deep web pedos who cares about that level of security.

this is what you need for an casually sane browsing...
>https everywhere
>ublock origin

for a more casually autistic experience...
>referer control (refcontrol is outdated)
>self-destructing cookies
>canvasblocker

>>55276726
there is one addon that requires zero configuration, works most of the time and works on all browsers

its called common sense

>>55276726
how do you know that you downloaded authentic noscript and not KGB_botnet 3.0 ?

>>55276726
that's not the main reason to stop using it
noscript is malware
https://liltinkerer.surge.sh/noscript.html

>>55281536
>using your personal blog as a source
ayy lmao

>>55279967
OMG! I'm so mad now!!!1! >:^(

No script isn't a privacy addon, it's a manual ad block.

You're better off with ublock and flashblock than noscript.