>gtkfags will never feel the might and handiness of file

>>55203411
But we don't have to deal with the ugly as ever KDE. I'd say it works out in the end.

>>55203411
seek professional help

>>55203418
Yeah. Only you have to deal with is mobile UI on your computer, lol

>>55203411
What is her name?

File: Dankek_ev_kek2.jpg (162KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 480x270px

>>55203455
>her

>>55203455
Reitz. dont you see?

>>55203411
That looks polished as fuck

>>55203411
Coming from a GNOME user, KDE was more consistent with good performance to be honest.

Nautilus does not respond time to time while doing SFTP transfer. It severly lacks options of customization.

KDE worked better, even with Samba

>Fallout 4
>/b/
>Russian /b/
>Russian lettering
>KDE
>Download Manager addon
>1366x768

File: Screenshot from 2016-06-22 11-54-41.png (151KB, 881x669px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 881x669px

>>55203411
tell me you're better

File: Screenshot from 2016-06-22 18-55-07.png (559KB, 1366x767px) Image search: [Google]

559KB, 1366x767px

>>55203508
As I said, not a fan of GNOME

>>55203521
Now make them bigger so they can actually be used as thumbnails

File: Screenshot from 2016-06-22 18-56-26.png (210KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 1366x768px

>>55203522
And what do you know, it froze again.

>>55203524
i guess you want the thumbnails bigger than the previewer, gtk cant do that

File: 1462744480253.jpg (68KB, 431x450px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 431x450px

>>55203522
>>55203531

>>55203411

I almost think this is a troll post. how do you live with yourself knowing you those miniscule icons rather than an actually visible preview or a more compact text-only list? and then you have the audacity to make a whole thread just to claim that it's better than the competitor. anywho, lmao glad to see linux still struggles with font antialiasing, enjoy ur joke hobbyst os t ttyl

-euphoric windows 7 classic theme user

>>55203696
Can't you see the slider? That shit can be made huge as fuck.

>>55203701
can be. but isnt

>>55203524
>so they can actually be used
They look pretty useful to me for quickly identifying an image. I don't need fullHD thumbnails that I can scrutinize at 800% zoom level.

>>55203663
Nice denial faggot

File: Screenshot_20160622_193101.png (306KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 1920x1080px

>>55203696

>>55203721
>Gnome
>GTK
Pick one.

File: poop.png (153KB, 2256x1716px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 2256x1716px

>>55203731
>euphoric Microsoft© Windows®™ classic theme user
I fart in your general direction.

>>55203576
That's the point.

>>55203719
Those tiny icons definitely aren't big enough. Unless you're referring to the large preview once you've clicked an image, which is irrelevant.

>>55203411
I wouldn't want to if I only had folders of that rat face anyway.

File: fag.jpg (163KB, 800x569px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 800x569px

>>55203411
>slavfags
cheeki breeki m8?

>>55203892
i v damki

File: 1457647544121.jpg (40KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 720x720px

>>55203721

>>55203737
GNOME uses gtk, and will never use Qt

File: 1429177114622.jpg (12KB, 258x245px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 258x245px

>KDE

>>55204643
>Frogposter

>>>/r/4chan

>>55204979
who are you quoting?

>goddess of /g/ in random dir
Kill yourself.

>>55205214
The person I replied to

>>55203411
I can have a different wallpaper on each desktop though.

File: Снимок экрана 2016-06-22 в 15.25.01.png (508KB, 1792x1189px) Image search: [Google]

508KB, 1792x1189px

>>55203411
>non-nexstep or non-osx fags will never feel the handiness of not having additional windows for dialogs

File: screenshot_general_search.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>2016
>relying on a folder structure to organize files

It is time to ascend my friends. Tags are superior.

>>55205342
Now do the same with webm files.

>>55203488
>obscene amounts of unused window space
>horrible icon placement
>no cohesive separation between window elements
Anything but polished