Face it /g/ Cables matter with audio fidelity Post cables H

>>55182382
Explain with concrete science why that cable is better than others.

>>55183219
It's bait dudette. Just sage and move on

File: serveimage.jpg (27KB, 310x232px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 310x232px

my sound got so much better after I moved my cables up off the carpet

>>55183427
sage doesn't do anything. you're supposed to report troll threads.
just report it and stop posting. stop. fucking. posting.

>>55183464
This shit is hilarious. Like do they seriously think the ground interferes with an electric signal in a wire?

So how do we cash in on the """audiophiles"""? How much initial investment would it cost?

>>55184220
scientifically it can through capacitive losses,
but for a speaker cable carrying upwards of 1v p2p, the losses are so negligible it's considered nil.

for line-level or lower-than line-level analog signals, cable quality matters to a point.

>>55183464
>letting your speakers sit on the floor
I really hope this picture is a joke. The emf from that carpet would destroy sound quality.
Why bother lifting the cables if your only going to do half the job

>>55184220
I dont know about that shit, but I can tell you the line in on my computer does some weird shit if the cable gets too close to the other cables or ground. its like a humming sound.

The guy in the picture is just a retard though