>MS16-068 is a fix for eight CVE-listed flaws in Edge. Like

>>55079462
It's probably due to the fact that I like my sister.

File: rfk 1463529792815.png (441KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 600x600px

>>55079473

>>55079473
i do too

>>55079540
Fuck of brendon, there's only room for 1 oniichan here.

>>55079462
Same way every other browser producing software vendors let it happen. Bugs and oversights. Microsoft are not unique in this, much as /g/ likes to portray them as the only ones producing insecure software.

>remote code execution
You mean Javascript?

File: exploits.png (70KB, 1226x484px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1226x484px

>>55079735
>Microsoft are not unique in this, much as /g/ likes to portray them as the only ones producing insecure software.
It's not that they're the only ones producing buggy software, it's just that they manage to write an order of magnitude or two more critical exploits / RCEs into their products.

(They ain't got nothing on Adobe though - adobe manages to beat even microsoft with flash player alone)

>>55079800
They're also the only ones with a new and relatively immature browser. I'd give it some more time, though I find the Firefox figures disconcerting and the Chrome figures suspicious.

>>55080042
holy shit youre dumb

kill yourself

>>55079462
Last pwn2own they only accepted exploits for chrome and edge due to everything else being "too easy".

topkek

>>55080725
>edge
>too easy
>8 RCE flaws

nope

>>55080735
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=pwn2own+2016+firefox

check top links fgt

>>55079495
Rot in hell weeaboo