>THEY FELL FOR THE 4GB HBM1 MEME AYYMDPOORFAGS CONFIRMED

>>55047366
Hyper is clearly gimped by Nvidi

>>55047458
>>>55047366 (OP)
>Hyper is clearly gimped by Nvidi

They get to undermine both AMD Fury users and 970 users!

Time to get a 1070!

>>55047366
Except nobody bought a Fury X. Plenty of people bought a 3.5GB meme card though. :^)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bm5ZCJah-FY

Unlucky lads.

>>55047779
>970 wins by 10% when bottlenecks are removed

Wew, still holding strong 2 and half years later. I can't wait to see the reactions of all those fury x users who have to downgrade to 3xx series to play at maximum settings lul.

>>55047366
This is a pretty fringe use case. The fury beats the 980ti in everything below 2160p hyper settings and at that point the frames are too low for the 980ti to have enjoyable platforming anyway.

>4 fps
laughed my fucking ass off.

in actuality though
>having a 4K monitor
>poorfag
>having a 4K monitor for videogames
>current year
>not knowing the Fury X destroys everything in reasonable resolutions because of HBM
>not knowing HBM is a god send

>>55047840
To be honest I am surprised it keeps up almost to the end and wins. The 4gb seems like a real bottleneck.

File: snapshot.jpg (91KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 720x720px

>>55047366

>>55047725
Or you can just turn the settings down for basically no imagine quality difference but a massive performance increase. At ultra settings the 970 beats both the 390x and fury x.

Also 4gb is still very much relevant and is no way outdated like these amd fanboys like to claim. Hell, a fucking 750 ti with 2gb vram still runs games perfectly fine if you're on a budget.

>>55047880
Image quality*

>>55047840
This

File: me-catalyst-bench-1440-ultra.png (28KB, 786x412px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 786x412px

>>55047840

>>55047366
lol, EA games.

>>>/v/ you filthy /v/ermin

>>55047880
clearly you weren't here for wood screws.
once a meme as powerful as >3.5 has been unleashed there is no stopping it. it does not matter what the reality of the situation is.

>>55047947
It's all double standards. For example:

>"what if the 480x can't max out all the latest games?"
>fanboys have been saying " i-it doesn't matter, j-just lower the settings"
>"t-the difference between high and ultra i-is unnoticeable"

But when it comes to nvidia

>le xD nvidia can't max this game out
>any person with a brain says "just lower the settings then"
>amd fanboys: "WHAAT!? Lower settings? That's stupid!"
>"lowering settings is for nvidiots"

This has literally what I've been seeing on /g/ since the mirrors edge video came out.

>>55047831
>>>55047779
>>970 wins by 10% when bottlenecks are removed
>Wew, still holding strong 2 and half years later. I can't wait to see the reactions of all those fury x users who have to downgrade to 3xx series to play at maximum settings lul.

If you remove the bottlenecks of the 390x it can win by x amount.