http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/ar ticles/geforce-gtx-1070

>>55009485

>$380

no thanks, RX 480 it is

>>55009502
It has way better performance per card so if you want a god computer you can sli those

>>55009485
>housefire 2.0
no thank nividoits
>>55009536
a card more expensive than the other card is faster... oh that is some pretty smart stuff you tell me there, never would image that.
>sli
ahahahahahahah

>>55009556
autism

File: 131159539819.png (97KB, 213x264px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 213x264px

540-600€

Literally more expensive than the cheapest 980 Ti

I guess the time for me to upgrade from my 760 to a 970 is coming.

File: 1464790539915.png (159KB, 299x322px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 299x322px

>>55009536
>sli

>>55009502
>Paying $200 for a 4 year old r9 290 with lower power consumption
>b-b-but it scores well in ashes of singularity!

File: UAMMAD.jpg (160KB, 895x790px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 895x790px

>>55010933
nice meme

>>55010643
>buying the meme card when a 1060/ti will be about the same price & performance and consume less power and be supported for longer

>>55010604
what did you expect? how would they sell the Ti's if they put the price of 1070 below.

>>55009536
Why didn't you go to school today? Do your parents know you're home alone?

>>55010967
Thanks for proving my point.

>>55011028
Is this a meme now?

>>55010604
Where did you get those prices from? FE here is listed at 500€

>>55013399
No famalam, it's just meant to be played

Now where can I actually buy it for $380?

$450 + blower + out of stock = meh

>>55014383
Less "where" and more "when."

The reference cooler is $449. That's the only variant out right now. It might take a few weeks or more for the non-reference models to start coming out. Those will be the ones that will sell for $380.

You can use this time to see reviews of both the 1070 and the upcoming RX 480. The 480 looks kinda promising, but so far no one has gotten their hands on it and it's only "leaked" numbers and AMD press releases so far. If the 480 lives up to the hype I might get it, but even then the 1070 is probably the card I'll get.

>>55009502
This

>>55016067
The other variants are already available for preorder and they cost the same or more than founders.

>>55010933
>14nm
>REBRAND! XDXDXDXXDDDD
>>>/v/

File: little dubs.jpg (10KB, 233x233px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 233x233px

>mfw we still have 20 more days of shitposting...
...at least

>380$
>it's actually 520€ here
well yeah sure

>>55009485
5 0 0 €
0
0
€

File: 725506017458427.jpg (31KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 480x480px

>>55011028
>implying amd doesn't do shit like this.

>>55010933

If you wanna play that card anon:

Nvidia must be fucking up bad if they can't stump a 4 year old gpu and AMD is just releasing it for the 4 time in a row.

Also, remember the GPU inside the GTX 8800 was re-released several times in the 9 series and the 200 series..

It even went to the OEM market as a 300 series.

And that chip was truly untouched.

>>55017829
This one at least looks good.

I found a 980ti hybrid locally on CL for 300. Worth?

Kitguru leaked 480s in crossfire lose to the 1070 in all games but aots.

>>55017829
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

holy shit, how will amdrones defend this

>>55018024
source me family

>>55018042
Saw it on the forum a post by Matthew Wilson

>>55017829
I'll take red over puke green any day of the week senpai

>>55018082
It was a post from Anton shilov

>>55010933
the "rebrand" meme needs to stop

>>55018082
i think he removed it because it's not in his recent posts

>>55018026
>how will amdrones defend this

see

>>55018085
>>55018002

PAPER LAUNCH
A
P
E
R LAUNCH

these things won't be out until like a month from now

File: gtx.jpg (102KB, 1000x455px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1000x455px

>>55009485
Thanks Australia.
If only Tony was still here.

>>55018153
Kyle from hardocp confirmed that the 480 is a 150w hot turd with similar performance to a r9 380

>>55017829
>>55018026
>>55018381
It's honestly not that bad. The scorpion looks like shit though, take that away and it's a decent looking case.

>>55018436
retard
tony is the reason for the high prices
before tony we had parity at worst (usually it was a bit higher) with USD and could just order online

>>55018446
i keep finding more truth to what kyle is saying all the time. why would they ban all reviews before the release day? if the product was so amazing like all these fanboys are claiming with their "official sources" aka wccftech, why are they hiding it? surely they'd want to build up hype for the product before the release date just like nvidia did. look at how well the 10xx series is selling.

they're hiding something imho. i'm guessing that the numbers weren't up to scratch and they're trying hard not to let anyone find out. the only bench they showed was a fucking aots benchmark which is a very, very specific case scenario concerning performance. at least nvidia showed actual gameplay with doom.

>>55018488
We need Tone to crash this plane with no survivors

>>55018498
Hardocp is the only respected benchmark site on /g/

Kyle wouldn't bet the credibility of his site if he wasn't 150% sure

File: amd-logo-on-bulldozer.jpg (57KB, 500x321px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 500x321px

>>55018621
>Kyle wouldn't
I remember when a picture of a bulldozer pissed him off so bad!

would an i5 6400 be sufficient with this card or would there be some bottleneck? I'm an AMD guy, trying to switch over after I saw the price tag on this card.

Where the hell is this $379 price point? Everything I'm seeing is closer to $500.

>>55019055

I have a i5 4460 and I don't even worry about bottleneck. You are fine.

>>55019116
there are no aftermarket cards yet. the thing only came out yesterday.

>>55019122
Well that makes me feel a lot better. Damn, this is going to be a very affordable build.

>>55009485
>$449.00 from NoVideo store
How about no?

>>55009502
Oh fuck really? I can just get 2 480's for 20 bucks more wtf

>>55011044

Nvidiots will defend upward price creep.

>>55019589
It's rumored that there's a 1060 and a 1060 ti. So if there's a 1050 too, then the 1060 ti is the successor to the 970 and prices haven't really crept upwards.

File: 50458483.jpg (113KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 400x400px

>>55011028
Watch him get AMD cards to troll the case

>>55019589
if anything it'll go down when they release the 1080 ti. if i recall correctly they lopped off $50-$100 off the 980 to accommodate for the 980 ti.

What do you guys think about the directx12 performance favoring AMD architecture?

>>55019620
660ti slightly beat the previous generation flagship and cost $250.
970 slightly beat the previous generation flagship and cost $330
1070 slightly beats the previous gneration flagship and costs $380
there definitely is a creep upwards

What manufacturer should I look for in the 1070?

File: 1460347507714.jpg (21KB, 355x323px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 355x323px

>>55019684
AMD

File: cfe5f93b6e7490105c2e2166c052fff0.png (68KB, 697x405px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 697x405px

>>55019646
i don't know, but this youtuber seems to have explained the situation to some deluded fanboys.

>>55019669
>there definitely is a creep upwards
Along with the price and relative performance of the flagship card.

>>55019620

>1060ti is the successor to the 970

That's now how any of this works.

>>55019707
You're a colossal idiot if you think that's how this works.

>>55019684
evga obviously. they make the best custom boards by far. too bad amd owners will never get to experience the greatness that is evga.

>>55019723
Yes, it is. If the 1060ti is in the same price bracket of the 970, I'm going to think of it as the successor to the 970.

>>55019736
If the 1060ti ever comes out.
There were tons of rumors for a 960ti but it never happened.

>>55019749
I know. I'm just saying, IF.

>>55019736

If you are being sincere, then you just made the stupidest post in this entire thread.

>>55019764
How? Companies change their branding schemes all the time. I think price brackets is a more fair comparison. Nobody is going to compare the 1070 to whatever AMD puts out that is the 970s former bracket, they're going to compare it with what costs as much as a 1070.

>>55019728
Is it really that much better than everything else that you have to buy from them?

File: kingpin_980ti_6.jpg (161KB, 620x414px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 620x414px

>>55019782
they make the sexiest looking coolers. also their lowest offering which is generally the EVGA Superlocked varient, is always really cheap but has great performance compared to MSI, Gigabyte and ASUS who are always more expensive because of >muh 16 gazillion color LED's but performance is pretty much negligible.

>>55019872
My friend just bought a bunch of computer parts but he can't find a 1070 and he wants to get one quickly because he is off work. I don't think he would mind paying a little extra.

>>55019872
Agreed. EVGA is truly the superior option.

>>55009502
>buying something worse than a GTX 970

>>55011028
I actually got this case it's not as bright as in the photo

>>55016067
$380 is MSRP. In actuality, it's more like $420 (and no, I'm not kidding. it's seriously around $420)

File: amd-radeon-rx-480.jpg (106KB, 1000x600px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1000x600px

>>55009502
This

1070,1070sli and 1080 benchmarks.
Funny how my 1080 beats sli1070 in 4k on doom, but rest of games they look fairly impressive (bar the ashes game)
https://youtu.be/tn4oIa4erVs

Has anyone ever had a iChill card? are they good?

>>55020999
That side looks fine, but the other side is exposed. Hopefully there's a back-plate version.

>>55009485
GTX 970 or R9 390?

I've heard the R9 is more "future proof" since it has more RAM.

jesus faggots you are all arguing over fucking vidya brixx. "ooh my vidya brix gets 5 more fps in 4k than your vidya brix"

go back to /v/ faggots

File: Screenshot_2016-06-11-05-13-31.png (354KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

354KB, 1080x1920px

>>55009485
>$449
"But we promise the other cards will be $379"

>>55021957
>founders edition

>>55022016
>>>55021957 (You)
>>founders edition
You probably won't find any 1070s at $380 for months and months, hence my picture.

File: 1070.jpg (353KB, 1097x839px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 1097x839px

fuck this country...
is it at least a leap in performance from 970?

>>55021957
>retailers over charging because of high demand is Nvidia's fault

>>55009485
>THANK YOU BASED NVIDIA
Thank you indeed, for paper launching this card, with this card nowhere to be available for $380

>>55022199
You idiot, it's not because of high demand, there isn't enough cards to go around, this wasn't an actual launch

>>55021510
Wait you dumb dumb knock yourself out for a month if you have to

>>55021510
If you're in Europe, I'd get the R9 390X not the 390

>>55022465
R9 390 = 255€
http://www.mindfactory.de/product_info.php/8192MB-PowerColor-Radeon-R9-390-PCS--Aktiv-PCIe-3-0-x16--Retail-_1006137.html
R9 390X = 300€
http://www.mindfactory.de/product_info.php/8192MB-Sapphire-Radeon-R9-390X-Nitro-inkl-Backplate-Aktiv-PCIe-3-0-x16--_1023178.html

The 390 seems better value. It's also interesting that both of those cards costed 50€ more just 1 month ago.

>>55022286
Demand exceeds supply. I got mine from Nvidia for $450. All the stores that aren't the Nvidia store are charging more than Nvidia because it's those retailers being greedier than Nvidia.

>>55022176
might as well get a 1080

>>55009485
Are those new amd and nvidia cards significantly cooler and quieter?

I have an r9 290 pcs+ and it works just fine for me but it's extremely loud and if i create a custom fan profile with lower fan speeds temps sometimes go very high, like 85-90c. I would buy a new card if it was quiet.

>>55009556
The problem is, nvidias mid-low endcard (1070) beats AMDs absolute highend card (rx 480) already.

>>55018002
Are you serious? Both look like shit.

>>55009502
if it was 400 EUR in europoor, would buy (specially since AMD is terrorist)

>>55019632
Haha this image is really funny, I will save it to my harddrive if you don't mind :~)

>>55019872
Is this an 1slot cooler?

>>55022798
The 480 is not their latest high end card, dude.
AMD released their low-mid card first this generation.
You can tell because it's $200, you fucking tard

>>55023048
>you fucking tard

Dude, no reason to be so aggressive

>>55023065
Gold stars for failure created millenials, shitlord.

My patience waiting for it to be back in stock is kill, should I just bite the bullet and buy a prebuilt and pay that extra $ ? I was going to build a new one regardless so eh

>>55022798
There's still the Fury X. . .

File: 1458958225129.jpg (53KB, 604x604px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 604x604px

>>55023797
>should I just bite the bullet and buy a prebuilt
you should just eat the bullet

>>55020956
Taxes are a thing.
The 1070s launched @500€ here, models for 470 popping up already. I really hope there'll be something around 400-420 by soon (probably when the AMD cards are out and the need-it-right-now-no-matter-the-price-crowd is saturated), my new rig needs building

>>55009485
So, I got a question. Im still rocking a 660 and want to upgrade soon. I was looking into the 390x when the 1070 was announced. since the former costs 500€ and the 390x has already dropped to 350€, is it worth to spend 150 bucks more on the 1070? is the new pascal arcitecture really going to smash all existing chipsets?

>>55023883
:^)

>>55026235
>using the smiley with a carat nose

$560 in Finland.

i'm planning to buy either 1070 or RX 480 but i don't know if my CPU is good enough.

I got i5-3570K 3.40GHz, but from what i've seen ,better is not really needed. Is that true?

>want to get 1080
>costs 100 more than expected
okay..I'll just get a 1070 I guess..
>costs 100 more than expected

>gap difference between 1070 and 1080 is £125


wtf is this

>>55022594
I tried to get one from Nvidia they said they were out 35 seconds after they came available. Microcenter has probably 75 locations every one of them had at least 2 in stock 4 Max. They're being sold on eBay for $700-780.

I didn't realise yurop had to pay so much more for NVIDIA. EVGA 1070 base is currently ~373 euro equivalent before taxes.

File: 2 stars.jpg (91KB, 1479x606px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 1479x606px

kek

Crossfire is cancer dont bother

File: 2016-06-11 17_47_22 TY NVIDIA.webm (411KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

411KB, 1920x1080px

THANK YOU BASED NVIDIA

File: 1443859768881.jpg (156KB, 474x595px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 474x595px

>>55010604
>tfw somebody wants to sell me a 350 euro MSI gaming 980ti 6G

Nvidia can go fuck themselves in the ass with their prices on the Pascal cards.

These cards are built on a smaller node and should be less expensive than last generation's card, not more expensive.

>>55021427
>Funny how my 1080 beats sli1070 in 4k on doom
Sounds like it lacks an SLI profile

>>55009485
This thing will probably be at 700 bucks here since they are going to sell the 1080 around 900$.

>>55028607
It only just had one added a few days ago.

>>55022807
AMD IS A RELIGION OF PEACE(smalltext)

looking to upgrade from a fuckin 650 galax so I can play overwatch and other great gayms as well as actually render video well. What get? Wait for Rx 480, wait for reduced price 970, bite it and buy 1070, or wait for 390 polaris edition? I'm poor, 300 is around the most I want to pay but I can wait.

>>55029173
Wait for Rx 480 unless the benchmarks show AMD fucked up.

File: 1465599188879.jpg (50KB, 924x569px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 924x569px

>>55009536
You stupid fucking cunt!
Do you know what SLi is Do you know what fucking CrossFire is? Fucking Google it before you fucking use the term. You make all fucking AMD users look like a fucking god damn asshole!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>55026301
sauce

>>55028529
>this
DO NOT UPDATE YOUR VIDYA DRIVERS IF HAVING NVIDIA 7XX SERIES CARDS
T. Nvidiot with gimped gpu

When are the aftermarket 1070s not going to be out of stock

>>55009485
1070 or a 1080 for 1080p max settings?

File: 1465186480594.jpg (15KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 256x256px

VOTE HERE

http://www.strawpoll.me/10458894

http://www.strawpoll.me/10458894

http://www.strawpoll.me/10458894

http://www.strawpoll.me/10458894

http://www.strawpoll.me/10458894

>>55019749

because it wasn't needed, the card itself did exist and was sent to some reviewers. it had 1280 cores (~400 less than 970) and 3gb of vram.

>>55028426
Probably because of the thermal throttling