>Yeah, I totally understand Kierkegaard! Knight of Faith,

I'm not defending teenage obsessions with existentialism and faux fideism, but Christ is the Logos, too.

who are you quoting

Is Kierkegaard that reliant on his language? Will I be missing out even if I read him in Swedish?

>>33728
Danish -> Swedish is a pretty mild translation. It's like a translation from harder middle English to modern English, isn't it?

>>32369
Surely the translation cannot make that much of a difference??? I would understand if we were talking about reading for the prose...