Does John Haack roid?
These numbers are crazy:
298kg squat
200kg bench
315kg deadlift
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3vR-OFazyU
He claims because he is in the 83kg weight class it's almost impossible to roid and maintain that low weight
No, some people just have amazing genetics for strength
ive seen myself and other dudes get progress obviously im not on that level but ill believe it
but i cant understand how he makes that weight
>>42775539
>being this much of a first year lifter
>Competes in drug-feds
>Switches to the only tested fed, wins worlds
>Quickly switches back to drug-feds afterwards
Hmmmmmm.....
Also there have been people in the -59kg class who have tested positive. That's the dumbest excuse I've ever heard.
>>42775565
>No realizing how fucking good some people are genetically
Look at frog in PLG
>>42775555
i'd say he's probably maximised the amount of muscle to fat ratio that is naturally possible on his frame for 83kg
>>42775517
>He claims because he is in the 83kg weight class it's almost impossible to roid and maintain that low weight
TOP KEK. Just no. He is doing winstrol, 100%. That drug is really good for maintaining low bodyweight without losing strength and really good for being strong. Athletes have been using this stuff for ages to get really strong and to make weight
>>42775625
>let's make this claim with no evidence except unrelated anecdotes
>>42775517
He takes t-bol.
>>42775635
>with no evidence except unrelated anecdotes
not him but he has a point look at what olympic weightlifters pop for
winstrol is one of their most popular drugs
>>42775517
>it's almost impossible to roid and maintain that low weight
>>42775720
but haack competes in a sport that requires a lot of muscle
>>42775517
What's the most impressive about his lifts is by far is leanness and light bodyweight, specially for his height.
He must be really fucking lean to be able to compete with people half a foot shorter than him in the same weight class.
>>42775736
>requires a lot of muscle
>>42775762
He's pretty big though
>>42775776
yes but strength and hypertrophy are not directly related
>>42775788
Yes they are
Greater hypertrophy gives you greater potential for strength
>>42775762
implying that guy is a good example
he has long arms plus he deadlifts sumo his other lifts are shit
>>42775788
>yes but strength and hypertrophy are not directly related
they are
find me a person who benches 405 who has a small chest, you literally cant
>>42775578
frog is not natty he said it himself you dyel
>>42776059
>Roiding for that
>>42776040
>>42776055
they aren't anywhere before (elite) level. Prior to that cns specialization can dominate
>>42776062
thats an assumption and a half
>>42776040
>greater potential for strength
sure I'll agree with that point of it
>>42776055
https://www.strongerbyscience.com/size-vs-strength/
>>42776055
405 is an insane amount, to get that naturally you'd have to train for many years, you are literally retarded
you idiots think that passing drug tests means your natty. remember how many drug tests Lance Armstrong passed?
everybody in the ipf is on gear. anyone who isn't is stupid as fuck.
>>42775517
>almost impossible to roid and maintain that low weight
holy fuck you dumbass
>>42775517
>benches my deadlift
i don't like this feel
>>42776239
Anyone who makes baseless assumptions with no evidence and expects people to blindly believe them is stupid as fuck.
>>42776304
gullible cunt
>>42776239
kek, good luck beating doping tests if you're scandinavian
>>42776419
Keep throwing random insults.
>>42775517
>315kg deadlift
>83kg weight class
>3.8 deadlift to bodyweight weight class
>does he roid
welcome to new /fit/
>>42776614
Welcome to /fit/: where absolutely no evidence that he roids, only counter evidence that he doesn't roid because he competed in a drug tested federation, means he roids
haack obviously takes ped, but he's still strong naturally and has good leverages for powerlifting
>>42776654
>obviously
>but cannot show any evidence
>>42776481
as long as you are on the payroll of judeo globo homo you can take drugs.
>>42776059
Nope still antty and never said I wasn't lmao
>>42775517
yes, u cant be that strong at that weight natty
>>42775788
Fitocracy has zero redeeming value. I logged in recently and was blown away by the faggotry.
>>42776055
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l84vmuuuHRg
???
>>42776950
Has has a big chest though
>>42776684
his lifts and the sport he competes in are evidence enough if you're not completely oblivious about lifting, but defend him all you want, i think he's great
>>42776968
Not really. Maybe for you.
>>42776950
look up his instagram or whatever his chest is developed, he just does not train in any other lift hence why he looks like that
>>42775788
Kek I ran a half marathon almost twenty minutes faster at 220lbs.
>>42775517
maybe, maybe not, impossible to know for certain
roids or not he's an absolute genetic freak
>>42775565
oh the fucking irony
>>42775762
you posted a deadlift specialist with shitty bench/sq numbers like this is some sort of counterpoint? next you'll show me a guy with 2 inch long arms and a barrel chest who can bench a lot without being jacked
>>42776950
https://www.instagram.com/p/BGUNWa9qjFm/?hl=en&taken-by=ufpwrlifter
his chest is fairly big
>>42777271
>maybe, maybe not, impossible to know for certain
it doesn't matter to me, but without any evidence you still know he juices. you don't beat other elite level athletes who juice without doing it yourself
>>42775517
Anyone who is stronger than me is obviously enhanced. So yes, he's on gear
>>42775517
Yes stupid.
All adults in any kind of athletic endeavor or who's money depends on their looks or performance in an athletic event takes gear.
He is on gear.
>>42776049
>waaaah he deadlifts sumo
>nearly 500lb squat
>over 300lb bench
His bench kinda sucks but he's stronger than you, mate. He can also OHP 185 without really training for it
>Does John Haack roid?
yes
>>42779810
Thank you for your contribution
>>42775517
Freak genetics, best coaching, best diet and conditioning
Possibly PEDs