Hey /fit/, I'm at 10% bf and I want to know how I could

File: 17333-03.png (149KB, 705x464px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 705x464px

>>42724013
you're 10% bf man wtf you don't need to cut anymore.

12% is optimal for both performance and face aesthetics. Only reason you would ever need to go below that is if you're a model, actor or a bodybuilder which if that were the case you would already know how to cut...

Eat raw chicken. It will make you shit and puke up that excess fat. You'll be 0% in no time

>>42724484
12% is optimal? For what, sports? Lifting? Calisthenics? Where do you get that number from?

File: hqdefault.jpg (13KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 480x360px

Is beetlejuice a natty nigga?

>>42726135
>>42726135
Who, me?

>>42725979
Attractiveness. There's a study that showed it was optimal for men. Too much less and you look like you're staving.

>>42726135
Based Beet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWuHHMuxTQY

File: giganiga.jpg (7KB, 184x184px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 184x184px

>>42726135
I imagine how he would look if his mother took roids instead of crack, when she had him.

>>42727659
>Attractiveness. There's a study that sho

kys

>>42727659
Like these Ogus videos where it looks like he's dying

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fU3WdcnYNA

>>42725979
Health.
For a natural man 10-15% is optimal for looks, performance, and health.

You're not so fat that you're pumping out estrogen and the fat is impacting your looks and health, and you're not so skinny that you're essentially castrated and you look sick.

>>42728898
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFH0izWRSd4