Redpill me on PPL /fit/. I did Stronglifts for about a month while taking summer class and now that it's over, I switched to PPL and have been doing it for a week.
I like PPL more but I don't know if I made the right decision since everyone is telling me to go back to SL or do Starting Strength for aesthetics
>>42668718
PPL a shit, stronglifts a shit, actually reading starting strength is the best thing you can do as far as making gains as a beginner. You won't get to 1/2/3/4 in 6 months with PPL, but you can do it in 4 with SS.
Is that photo U of T?
>>42668718
Grayskulls linear progression
The best out there. Dynamic, flexible, 10/10 I'm doing it again after 6 months out of the gym
>>42668718
For novices, PPL is like SS except you do twice the work for half the progress.
Congrats. Also stop worrying about looking pretty and just get fucking strong. You can sneak in your glamor lifts at the end of each workout.
>>42668718
make your own routine, i have my own routine and its work good for me
PPL and SS are for noobs that dont know how to internet
>>42668718
>>42668740
>>42668799
PPL is best if you just do UL, combine both P's. That's what I'm doing. Making v. good gains, and it's been about 10 months.
>>42668896
You're weak and you look like shit. You're not an authority here with your 4 months of lifting experience.
>>42668922
So we should listen to some obese man with no credentials or background in science.
Why should anyone listen to rippletoe?
>>42668922
>You're weak and you look like shit
if i have 1 year lifting then you have all the right to say that but i have only 4 month
im 185 lbs, when i get to 200 lbs im going to cut then bulk on whey with 500 cals surplus
i have some knowledge because i read many articles and things like that
>>42668953
>Why wshoukd anyone listen to rippetoe
Because he has 30 years of coaching experience you mongoloid. It's a BEGINNER PROGRAM. You do it for 6-8 months then move on to intermediate programming.
I guarantee you this fucking pussy is barely squatting 2plate
>>42668896
>>42668740
ppl is more a maintenance type program. You arent going to see alot of progress with it doing it pxpxlxx
I have used the PPL for about a year mostly doing pplxppl and seen some ok results but mostly just more definition and no real size gains, but that wasnt what I was about as I am actually more focused on cycling and gains just nice but not the goal. for me.
For me I would stick to heavy compounds in a 5x5 or switch to a pyramid with 7 sets pattern for my main lifts and 4x8-12 for all other accessories, usually 3 other exercises per that days muscle group
>>42669052
>I guarantee you this fucking pussy is barely squatting 2plate
well i only have 1 month and a half doing legs, my RM is 1plate
why are you so rude?
are you BN?
>>42669065
please refrain from commenting until you have been lifting for more than a year, spreading bull shit doesnt do anyone any good. This board used to help eachother than faggots like you became the norm and the sence of community is dying because of this faggotry. Basically shut the fuck up when you dont know what you are talking about.
>>42669061
why dont you do hypertrophy workout?
that is what im doing with mine routine
>>42668953
It's a BEGINNER program which he has coached many BEGINNERS through their BEGINNER phase where they have gained a significant amount of total body strength, awareness, and lean mass. You know, exactly what's supposed to happen when you're a BEGINNER.
>>42668966
Anybody can write a fucking article you dip. Go read peer reviewed studies and scientific papers on the subject.
>>42669093
because adding some strength and maintenance is what allows me to race and be fast and have good endurance. Looking like a frat boy is not my goals. in all honesty, I lift more in winter and do a mini bulk and ride much more in spring, summer, fall during peak riding season.
>>42669097
>Go read peer reviewed studies and scientific papers on the subject.
but i have read some and what about BB.com?
are they fake?
>>42669065
Namefags like you are a goddamn blight. Fuck off and lurk until you have something to contribute besides pidgin English and noob gains. There are folks in this shithole with degrees in exercise physiology, who deadlift more with their limp dicks than your powerlifting total, who don't feel the compulsive need to collect (you)'s like a wannabee internet celery melonair. Try again when you can pull your bodyweight
>>42669140
That shit is literally on par with t-nation. It's a joke and broscience at best.
>>42669146
why are you so mad?
calm down, you are taking this too seriously
just look, writting all those words
>>42668718
If you have the endurance, go for it. Beginners burn out really quick on PPL so its not good for someone who only lifts 1 month
>>42669154
well internet is use full, i put thinks like "massive chest workout"
this is my chest routine
bench press 5x 8-10
dumbbell flat bench 3x 12
incline barbell 5x 5-8
decline dumbbell 4x12
incline dumbbell 4x 10
flies machine 4x 12
>>42669220
That's fucking stupid, you don't need that much volume in one day, you can't even bench 2pl8.
I bench north of 3 and don't do that much in one day.
>>42669249
so what do you think i should i do?
>>42668718
Stick with PPL or go with PPLL (push, pull, lift, legs), ignore the SL and SS retards. SL is good for adding strength for short periods of time but definitely needs to be changed out after 6-8 weeks.
>>42669279
Read the fucking sticky
Faggot
>>42669323
No
according too many sources, that bench routine and workout my chest to grow bigger
do your research
>>42669337
>>42669279
Your research doesn't qualify as anything. "This guy on bb.com said this will make my chest grow" doesn't qualify as research or a good source. Look up frequency and weekly volume. Having higher frequency will make you stronger faster and having higher weekly volume will make you bigger faster.
>>42669337
>according too many sources, that bench routine and workout my chest to grow bigger
Lifting will make your chest bigger?That's what I said paco. If you can't into English I really can't help you, although it would explain why you're so confused after reading articles, presumably in english
>>42669220
I hope you do realize that body part splits with a ton of volume are made for enhanced athletes, right? Protein synthesis as a natural lifter only lasts for about 48 hours, which means that it's quite limited what you can get out of a single workout for a single musclegroup, hence why people will split it into multiple sessions hitting the muscle at least 2 times a week. Too much volume and you may not even be able to recover in a week.
Steroid users on the other hand have enhanced protein synthesis which lasts for much longer (about 8 days, around 4 x as long) and can absorb a lot more protein, hence they can hit their muscles with much more volume and in a single day and get gains from all of it.
Lower your volume substantially and focus on progressive overload. You will get much better gains in both strength and muscle mass and you won't feel exhausted all of the time.
>>42669337
I'm not any of these guys, but please post a current body pic. We won't make fun of you, I'm just curious.
>>42669383
>That's what I said paco
no you didnt
>>42669352
so you are that chest workout doesnt work?
>"This guy on bb.com said this will make my chest grow"
i didnt say that
>>42669390
but hypertrophy is 8-12 reps
so how many reps should i do?
just filter the faggot
>>42669411
>We won't make fun of you
lol do you think im one of those fags?
many people that laugh at other pics tend to be obese/skinny fat
give me a min
>>42669422
There's no such thing as a hypertrophy rep range, get that shit out of your head.
I'm saying it's subpar and your weekly volume is low as shit because it's all in one day and you move bitch weights after your second exercise.
>>42669422
This must be how Vitamin Avenger was before his accident. Dense as pig shit and convinced by immature narcissism that everything posted on the internet applied directly to him right now
>>42669422
>but hypertrophy is 8-12 reps
>so how many reps should i do?
Don't focus too much on rep ranges. Focus on lifting heavy. Hypertrophy happens at lower rep ranges, too. The main reason most bodybuilders lift light is because it allows for more volume, but as a natural lifter, you don't need that amount of volume (at least not as a beginner). Just focus on progressive overload for your main lifts and then throw in a few isolation exercises at the end. I would recommend you to find a program aimed at beginners and follow that.
>>42669279
Ice cream fitness 5x5 by Jason "Hemingway" Blaha
>>42669450
>you move bitch weights after your second exercise.
no i dont
i work chest tuesday and fridays
>>42669472
but i lift heavy
why dont your chest routine?
>>42668799
>Twice the work for half the progress
Lmao maybe for legs? SS is a COMPLETE JOKE for upper body strength
>>42669517
>lift heavy
>>42669065
>>42669537
that is heavy for me
you know i have seen people with 1 year lifting and i look bigger than them
im looking for chest workouts on the internet, im going to see what i can remove and add
>>42669585
Try lifting somewhere besides the gym at the anorexia rehab center
>>42669661
so you saying that too much volume wont do nothing for my chest?
what about pic related workout?
>>42669678
You're a dumbass, you don't lift heavy, and your level of volume is fucktarded especially for a beginner like yourself.
>>42669700
you didnt answer my question
>>42669730
still waiting on that current body pic
>>42669730
It's shit.
>>42669678
Nice job finding a routine on google images dipshit. Now, can you tell me how many athletes use this? It takes 5 minutes on photoshop to list any exercise next to a "shredded guy" clip art
>>42669747
i was just looking for an opinion
>>42669736
nah wont post
>>42669741
why?
it wont work for me?
im on 1500 calories surplus
>>42669760
Double your caloric surplus, use your current exercises in >>42669220
However, take the weight down so you can do 5x20 on all of them
>>42669700
>not doing max volume for max results
>not doing whatever it takes
>>42669786
i cant, with 1500 cals is 4500 cals day, i cant get more food
>>42669786
>take the weight down so you can do 5x20 on all of them
you are mocking me
>>42669760
I think that you won't post because you have an absolute beginner-tier physique and lifts. You should really stop acting like you know what you are talking about (and also remove the name) until you have more experience and bigger lifts under your belt.
>>42669816
my pic are here on /fit/, its weird you havent seen them
look at this on, i was 183 lbs here
>>42669816
>>42669849
Keep at it mang. With a skinnyfat physique like that you're clearly in a position to give advice
>>42669849
This is the guy namefagging and acting like an authority figure on /fit/.
>>42669988
its far away from skinny fat
i will cut once i get to 200lbs
>>42670025
You look about as good as janoy did 8 months ago
>>42670025
>far away from skinnyfat
delusions
>will cut when I get to 200
you are gonna be a fat fuck at 200 or it will take you years to get to that point boyo
>>42668718
>Starting Strength for aesthetics
You don't need a day dedicated to training legs, unless you are a professional bodybuilder.
Push/Pull twice a week, add some squats on push day if you want
>>42670062
bullshit, i look less dyels than many people with 1 year lifting
>>42670076
nope
im 188 now, im 1500 cal surplus, that is 3 lbs each week, boyo
>>42668912
Just started with PPL (metallicadpa's to be exact). What does your routine look like with just UL?
>>42670228
You know you have to be 18 to post here, right? Come back when your twink ass can grow chest hair
>>42670291
but i do have that, that is a comeback?
>>42669849
ahahahahahahhahahahaha
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
never post again
>>42669061
>I have used the PPL for about a year mostly doing pplxppl and seen some ok results but mostly just more definition
>>42669061
>>42669061
>>42669061
FYI, this is how you know someone's a total fucking noob who doesn't know what they're talking about. "Definition" has nothing to do with your routine and everything to do with eating at a deficit. You can gain or lose "definition" on every single routine that exists.
Ignore this guy, PPL is king.
>>42669061
there's a great ppl program that updates the movements every day on diognes
https://diogn.es/u/156
goood for beginners who don't know exactly what they want
>>42669220
You're retarded.
damn, why is PPL getting so much hate. I switched to a pplxppl 3 months ago and have gotten great gains.
>>42668718
PPL is great for intermediates who care about aesthetics. As a beginner I would advise GSLP, strength gains will be slower than SS or SL, but you'll actually look decent while doing Greyskull. Godspeed.
I am thinking of this routine pls say what you think.
Push 1
bench press
incline bench
weighted dips
skull crushers
rope pull down
lateral rise
db shoulder press
pull 1
weighted pull ups
bend over rows
shrugs
lat machine
bb curl
legs
squat
lounges
hamstring curl or whatever
push 2
db press
db flys
OHP
front raise
some isolation for triceps x2
pull 2
deads
up right row
seated row
inverted shrugs
preacher curls
so it P1P1xLxP2P2xLxP1P1
Obv it's not done, I am just considering this and will accept all comments and advice.
>>42668799
Yeah I think SS is basically a leg focused program and should be avoided. Most people want to develop upper body more than lower.
>>42668775
Can i just stick with the the /fit/ greyskull floating around? I switched to that last week from SL, because i was hating the lower body stuff (its already overly strong and big compared to rest)
>>42672888
How does anyone not roiding manage seven lifts in one workout?
Unless you lift light and barely need any rests, that sort of shit is time than I have.
>>42673035
ok, what do you suggest, 4 lifts? i've never done splits, i always had like 3 lifts per day+some light iso. so I have no idea what exactly is a realistic amount.
>>42668718
That is probably the best woman body shape I've seen
>>42673035
Around 6 is pretty standard for a PPL.
>>42668740
Oh fuck off. Starring strength is terrible, nowhere near enough upper body volume.
>>42673024
Yeah GSLP is solid, the progression method for it makes much more sense