I will be at the show tomorrow and I will spoil it for you asap. Ill literally make a thread as soon as I see one of them fall down. Ill be ready to upload a picture from my phone and I will have a text typed "______ won!" And will post before the news break out. I got front seats for this.
>>42637081
I'm actually perfectly fine with this.
If you posted pictures and shit like "you guys won't believe what just happened OMG!" or "I never expected this to happen!" as the fight was still taking place, then that would be actual trolling.
>>42637081
thanks for letting us know what to put in our filters so we dont have to see your faggot thread.
>implying the news don't write two separate articles and as soon as one guy wins they immediately publish the article
>implying anyone who cares about that fight doesn't watch it
>>42637192
I actually didnt know they do that.
>paying good money to see a predetermined fight
>>42637192
How many articles do they have to write for the WWE Royal Rumble?
>>42637208
They do that with everything
Every sports team that is in a final game each prints t shirt with the title champions and the winner team then uses it
>>42637081
>as soon as I see one of them fall down. Ill be ready to upload a picture from my phone and I will have a text typed "______ won!"
Lol it's hilarious how you think this is so conniving
Will there be like a 10 minute lag on the broadcast or something? As soon as it happens millions of people around the world will know almost instantaneously.
Ayy where can I get the fight footage without paying?
>>42637217
muh woke nigga
>>42637534
There'd be over 9000 spoiler threads since I can't watch it live
>>42637081
>I got front seats for this.
No you don't
>>42637208
They have lots of articles prewritten. There's one for the Queen's death by lots of major news organizations, at least one of them has been accidentally published before.