The fact your muscles burn before than average people at endurance activities and you perform better at low reps means you are fast twich fiber domimant ?
>preform better at low reps
no
if by lower reps you mean higher intensity yes
if you both squat 200kg, both of you 5 rep max is 180kg, but you preform 180kg x3 way faster than him than prob yes
>>42630508
And what about the burn thingy ? Do fast fiber people burn before ?
if you only train to do low reps, you'll be better at low reps than high reps. it dosent necessarily mean that your fibers are a certain way.
I think there is a test that use your X% of your 1RM, and the more reps you can do with that X% the more endurance you have.
>>42630626
But then how do you know you are a fast twich fiber dominant ?
https://www.t-nation.com/training/tapping-your-full-growth-potential
https://www.t-nation.com/training/tapping-your-full-growth-potential
>>42630651
There is no test for it. Just do strength +dynamic training +pylos +steroids. Afterwards you let your trainer say that you are genetically gifted. That is the truth between people that have more fasttwitch muscles.
>>42630651
well i dont know because i dont really care.
If you want to be bigger, you have to get stronger in a 6-20 rep range, that's it.
>>42630651
By killing yourself for being so mentally ill over insignificant shit
>>42630430
>no roids & no lifting vs roids & lifting
intredasting.jpeg
>>42630651
https://medical.23andme.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/wellness_muscle_composition_not_determined.pdf
if you do 23andme health analysis they tell you.
>tfw elite athlete genetics
>tfw always excelled in sports but always overweight
mixed feals
>>42630989
Rugby or nfl is for you then
Or powerlifting