What's the point of squatting ? You clearly gain ZERO a

good thread

goood thread

File: 14453526565790.jpg (7KB, 250x241px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x241px

>>42612949
>SL
>does sumo DL

gooood thread

goooood thread

lift way less than him yet x10 times more aesthetic.

dont fall for the strength meme.

I want her curry tinged ass on my face

>this guy trained for strength and got stronger! this confuses and distresses me!

goooooood thread OP

>>42612991
>>42612949
If he picks up bodybuilding program with his strength he'll look x10 times more aesthetic than you

>>42612949
i don't squat cus some ginger dyel spends 50mins in the squat rack. so whatevs just do some other shit

>>42613084
>If he picks up bodybuilding program
that ginger wouldn't be able to handle a bodybuilding routine. All strength, no stamina.

>>42612949
this is really sad. im glad i didnt fall for memes

>>42613084
>93kg bench

You know that's not strong at all

>>42612949
Some people are CNS heavy lifters, so they can lift big weights without looking huge. Both me and my brother are like that too.
I have similar lifts to this guy and I get called a dyel twink every time I post a CBT pic.

>>42613084

ah the old "strength base" meme

>>42612949
1. He's waering pants you cant see his legs.
2. His strength is pretty much DYEL-tier
3. He doesn't do chinups

Don't fall for the squat-bench-deadlift-ohp-no-chinups meme.

If he did squat, deadlift, chinups and presses and he got decently strong in all of them he would look good.

>if i squat a lot my upperbody wont grow
wow really made me think

>93kg bench 1rm so no chest
>165kg deadlift 1rm so no real traps or glutes/hamstrings
>ohp is sort of ok but we can't really see his shoulders.
>good squat but who gives a fuck about legs
yeah that's why he looks dyel. He's pretty weak where it actually matters.Let's see what he looks like when he can bench 2pl8 for 10, ohp 1pl8 for 10 and diddly 5pl8 for 1

>>42613259
you're just small

>>42613298
Just to make it clear what I was saying, those strength levels are lower than where I got with my newbie gains on a CALORIE DEFICIT. I went to 3x5x85 kg bench on a 5 MONTH CALORIE DEFICIT and I LOST 9 KG of body weight.

>>42613186
The guy I replied say the he lifts way less than than. So if 93kg isn't strong at all what would you call him?

>>42613395
English?

>>42612949
did you take into account squats respond well to slow-medium speed for hypertrophy and this guy squats faster than a bunny shags?

i promise you a lot less weight but a lot slower will take you much further is size is what you re looking for

>>42612949

150kg isn't even a lot.

>>42613362
>bragging about your 85 kg bench
jesus christ dude tone it down

>>42612949
the point is comparing your squat with other nerds on an imageboard

>>42613362
Height and weight before and after?

>>42613586
187cm before 86kg after 77kg.

>>42613525
nigga you are the living fact that strength =/= aesthetics/muscle mass, you are the pinnacle of a twink with a 500lb squat

>>42613857
Why would you do that though? Your original weight is more appropriate for someone your height. Why go into a deficit?

>>42613919
What? I'm pretty sure I was far over 20% BF. I was not terribly lean even at 77 kg. I didn't have visible abs or anything. I had a copious layer of fat all over me. 77kg 187cm is still BMI 22 so it's pretty good.

>>42613919
because weight is irrelevant, his bodyfat percentage is what actually matters

better to be a skeleton than a skeleton with a gut

>>42613893
thats because he tries to maintain his weight for his weightclass

if you want to gain muscle how are you gonna do that while maintaining bodyweight

File: 1497720252938.png (14KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 500x500px

>>42612949
Strength routines are retarded. Mega roiders recommend them because they know most newshit nattys won't be able to make good progress on them because they have no clue what they're doing and give up. This maintains plausible deniability for the frauds -- maybe they're just better at lifting than you as the newshit natty has been conditioned into thinking they're weak when in reality it's just an elaborate ploy for shilling and hiding fraud status. Think about it, suddenly widespread roids become available thanks to the internet and around the same time suddenly everyone starts claiming you have to do barbell strength routines even tho other routines had built successfull bodies for decades.

File: 1503297382806.jpg (77KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 800x800px

>>42613335
>tfw can bench 2pl8 for 17 reps, ohp 1pl8 for 20, and deadlift 500 for 1 but look like a fat piece of shit.

>>42613084
too bad 10 x 0 is 0 faggot

The real problem here is not the routine but how he executed it.

Just look at those graphs lmao. He fucked up big time on several occasions, probably not eating enough and stuck with the program too long.

It's fairly rare for these routines to last for 8 months, and if it lasted for 8 months CORRECTLY he should have bigger numbers if you just do the MATH.

He started with a 104 kg squat and ended with 147.5 kg. Like what the fuck? Why is he doing stronglifts with a squat of 104 kg? Even if he did have some newbie gains left in him it sure as hell shouldn't last for 8 months. What a fucking retard.

He's not forcing his body to grow by forcing himself on low volume for that long period with multiple stalls and very inefficent progress. You can do these novice routines for years if you love stalling, and you'll make progress, but it'll be super inefficient and you'll gain zero size.

Obviously he has to eat more and get bigger

At the end of the day if you want to "look like you lift" you need to take roids

>>42612949
I want her to sit on my face and come in my mouth. Give her click a nice heartbeat