>Get compliments from /fit/ on my gains with a pump >Get

>>42290785

Its what all of fitness is like.
Even roiders with 8% bf look meh in shit lighting and without a pump.

>>42290886
no they don't lol
>>42290785
natty lifting is a joke, i did my first cycle and i gotta say, even if it wasn't for the gains it would be much better than staying natty, i felt alive as fuck, woke up wanting to get stuff done, the energy you have is insane, recovery is insane also, after a heavy as fuck bench session my chest was sore for couple hours on the next day and thats it, i was ready to bench again

File: d11ea486c02b0043ab302d66f6d42eb1[1].jpg (134KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 1080x1080px

>>42290912
>no they don't lol

You obviously don't have a a decent body or you would know that you're wrong.
I bet you've never been below15%

>>42290927

The funny thing is that to the trained eye, you can see he's just as impressive on the left as he is on the right.

>>42290927
>implying this looks bad at all
>he isn't flexing his abs
>light isn't bad, it is 100% on his back
>can still see veins on arms
>dude has really good proportions

>>42290785
no, boogie trolls and calls everyone skinnyfat DYEL

File: 1417443075778.jpg (56KB, 500x609px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 500x609px

>>42290785
Yes.
Stay natty

File: sandow1.jpg (90KB, 540x704px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 540x704px

>>42290785

Can we all just take a moment to appreciate how aesthetic Sandow was?

>>42290927
>>42290932
except these are the shittiest cherry picked stillshot 2d pictures

in actual real life which you never experience you can tell if someone is impressive because there is this thing called depth perception which allows you to see their large amounts of mass