>not doing full body twice a week >not managing volume

ok

>>42239613
>any of this
>making it

pick one

>>42239613
concurrent periodization is generally for beginners

>>42239639
none*

>>42239639
>>42239647
all the fucking retards on this fucking board, jesus christ this is why most of you look like you dont life

>>42239653
Sorry brah, my life is centered around sport. Concurrent periodization is only for beginners in sport.

Although, I'm starting to think you don't actually know what concurrent periodization means. It was rather unusual to bring it up and all in regards to lifting.

>>42239613
Disregarding the FACT that there are literally endless ways to train and be succesfull, I don't see how training only twice a week could really be called concurrent periodization. The entire premise of concurrent periodization is that you try to develop - or at least maintain - all meaningful qualities at once, which is going to be nigh impossible if you only train twice a week. I get that you could have one day focusing on e.g. hypertrophy and another on strength, but that would hardly qualify as concurrent training, given that it's only two out of several qualities.

>>42239681
>>42239688
I bet you never fucking tried it.

>but muh theories....

>>42239613
>lifting twice a week
>making it

lmao

>>42239710
That reply to my post makes zero sense.

why did you make this thread looking for validation if you're so sure that lifting twice a week is effective?

btw enjoy your no gains

go to bed your drunk

>implying I don't