>multiple posts in a thread, >>42226353, saying deadlifts

>>42231897
Do not believe outrageous claims from literal nobodies when everyone that matters deadlifts heavy ass weight
Chinups and deadlifts are enough for back. Maybe some facepulls on bench days to hit rear delts, you need nothing more.

Firstly, don't listen to people who say any exercise is useless, because that is not true. I would happily bet $100 that anyone who makes these kinds of claims looks awful, small and is weak. All excercises have their uses.

You shouldn't replace deadlifts.
While its true that they arent """good mass builders""", they do provide a strength gain to the entire body that nothing else provides so well. And this strength transfers into moving more weight on the exercises that DO help you get bigger.

You should be doing at least one variant of rows btw.
Vertical pulling and horizontal pulling are the staple back movements.

jesus fucking christ
learn some basic source criticism and independent thought, OP

>some random anonymous person said deadlifts suck
>so obviously I have to stop doing deadlifts
>it's literally 50% of my back work

Oh all the way fuck yourself, OP. You're already not doing your upper back enough work and you're gonna cut out deadlifts because "multiple posts in a thread saying deadlifts are useless"?

>>42231937
deadlifts aren't good mass builders because most people here are doing one set of 5 a week

go deadlift with some actual volume and tell me it's not a good mass builder for the hamstrings, glutes, erectors, traps, and forearms

>>42232207

You're not wrong, but this thread is about the back.