Do you agree with women having the option to not breed with inferior male genetics and only having sex with Chads?
We already do this with pets, so why not let women do this with humans.
it already happens they choose their version of "chad" all the time do you think they have sex with people they don't find attractive
but i get what you mean but it already pretty much happens lmao
>>41794670
It didn't happened generations ago though.
>>41794694
does now tho
>>41794789
the manlet genes will dissapear in few generations though.
>>41794805
hopefully
>>41794656
Women always had that option, it's just now that resource aquisition is no longer a problem (for us) women base their desire mostly on physical attraction
>>41794656
>women having the option to not breed with
are you under the impression that it's currently acceptable to rape and then force a woman to keep your baby?
>>41795143
>abortion clinics doesn't exist
>>41794656
I would prefer the option to have cheaper genetic modification in the womb, so it would still be my child minus any genetic defects