Be honest /fit/, what do you find more impressive. >a 6ft

>>41676990
Obviously the 200 pound guy benching 295

What about the
>5'7 165lb guy benching 315

>>41676990
None. I care about aesthetics, who gives a shit how much you can lift

>>41676990
6 4 guy duh. It always goes by total weight no one cares about relative strength lmao

File: 1468002601899.png (34KB, 340x300px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 340x300px

>>41677072
>5'7
>guy

>>41677072
no one cares manlet

What about the 155lb guy benching 410

>>41676990
Is this because the lanklet has long arms, and therefore benching is hard for him?

Was asking cause my lifting buddy finally surpassed me. We started lifting together about a year ago. My max then was 285 and his was 225. We stopped lifting together cause of schedule conflicts. My bench went up slowly then back and forth between 275-295. Went on a cut 3 months ago while he kept bulking. Went to gym with him today and he decided to max out. He ended up getting 305. Was proud of him but jelly at the same time. Time to start bulking again I guess.

>>41677126
>>41677127
Nice consecutive numbers gentlemen. But you are both asinine lanklets who can't bench body weight, not due to height or long arms, but simply because you are weak bitches who wont eat or try hard enough to make it. Height legitimately does not matter in lifting or finding quality women. So what's your excuse?
>Inb4 lmao at least I'm not raging manlet

File: 1496106039524.jpg (17KB, 296x376px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 296x376px

>>41677072
>>41677127
>>41677126

File: manlets.png (1MB, 544x1113px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 544x1113px

>>41677193
calm down little guy

>>41677290
Solid excuse, I refute my statement, keep up the lmao1pl8 bench press.

Stop being coy.