Can anyone show me VIDEO evidence that deadlifting is dangerous

>>41638082
No there's not any video or even scientific evidence that deadlifts cause spine injury even with bad form.

You dont have anything better to do than make the same threads over and over?

>>41638112

Oh.
Why do people say its dangerous then?

>>41638120

I'll stop making them when you stop replying ;)

Or when someone provides video evidence of a deadlift causing a spinal injury.

>>41638082
Load up 6 plates, do not straighten your back and just lift it with your spine. When you are at the top (will never happen, but lets just assume) do not straighten back, be slouched over with a bent back, and hold it for 15 seconds. Then come back and gives us all the answer we are looking for.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fp-c-Dr8vuU

>>41638082
STOP posting this thread

File: 6plate (2).jpg (114KB, 526x658px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 526x658px

>>41638149

OP here.
Did it, nothing happened.

File: 1470784971226.jpg (369KB, 2048x1618px) Image search: [Google]

369KB, 2048x1618px

OP is a faggot

>>41638301

Oh boy another great point.

Zero evidence of spinal injury due to deadlifting still.
Evidence when???

>>41638174
Obviously not a spinal injury.

>>41638301
Rollinging

>>41638313
>monk

Shut up faggot and go meditate.

disc degeneration from deadlifting won't be seen on video, dumpass.

Digits confirm OP will die in his sleep tonight

lol OP is such a fag and needs to stop posting this thread.

That said, it is funny how there isn't actually any evidence being presented, just cop out answers

>>41638301
roll for theif