why is it that manlets usually have far better facial aesthetics

>>41321790
>floppy tits
>about 18 years old
would not bang/10

>>41321808
excuse me? those tits are perfection tier. they don't look floppy at all, just squished by her arm

>>41321819
Just gonna post about how saggy they are. Sorry you have shit taste anon.

>>41321819
>>41321827
I don't know could go either way
Have more pic? For science

File: tmp_22122-44037-867565603dfe8fb46d4a251063ab1c8c246792436.jpg (30KB, 602x468px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 602x468px

>>41321819
I'm just shitposting
I'm so desperate right now that even the half nigger with floppy tits and a moustache would work
>end me

>>41321849
>for science
It's summer

>>41321808
>>41321827
>porn addicts

File: daily-afternoon-randomness-in-hq-47-photos-211.jpg (168KB, 920x1090px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 920x1090px

>>41321790
That's not something I've ever noticed but assuming it's true,

It could be that, in the great evolutionary game, the taller men (height being a naturally attractive trait) required less impressive facial aesthetics to attract a mate. Whereas the shorter men with a disadvantage had to be more handsome to make up the difference.

>>41323595
Remember that faces look different depending on the angle that you're looking at them. So looking from below may make a face look better.

>>41321808
Virgin whos conditioned to fake porn titties detected

File: 1434548918141.gif (2MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x281px

>>41323606
Good point, I've actually noticed that ecen my own face looks better from a high angle.

>tfw 6'5 so everyone sees me from a low as fuck angle unless they're on stilts

What this anon said >>41323550

I've noticed how appealing those so called "floppy" tits are since I quit porn over 7 months ago. Sexy as fuuuu

Just gonna point out manlets aren't short because they have extra female hormones.

Your height is not determined by your test levels, you can be short and high test.

>>41323595
Absolute horseshit face and height are totally independent genetically

>>41323606
my face looks much better from above than it does from bottom. from bottom it looks like a mess

File: hafþór-júlíus-björnsson-shared-picture-spain-475456206.jpg (55KB, 467x467px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 467x467px

>>41323965
Sounds like something a manlet would say

Manlets are descended from men who had to rely on other traits than height or frame to attract a mate, good face notwithstanding

>>41323998

Or someone that's not retarded.

It could be that they're simply fully developed, so look older/more masculine at a younger age.

I'm 23 and still changing, but if you stop growing at like 17 then the rest of your body is gonna be fully developed soon after

>>41324065
>I'm 23 and still changing,
How can that be? Shouldn't it have stopped years ago?

I stopped growing at 14

Really tall guys always look a bit "elongated" unless their idiot parents were smart enough to feed them proper food and make them do sports.

Short guys are stocky and wider in general, face included, a wide face is pretty much 50% of male facial aesthetics in my book.

Just my theory.

>>41324104

I'm not growing taller anymore but my face shape is changing, my wrists are getting thicker etc.

Stopped growing but body still developing, which was my theory, I stopped growing at like 20 so I've only had 3 years of my body composition catching up to my new proportions, whereas if I stopped growing at like 15 I would've had 8 years for my body to develop proportionally

>>41323622
>>41323990
tilt your head backwards, then it should look better from a low angle.

>>41324113

> Really tall guys always look a bit "elongated" unless their idiot parents were smart enough to feed them proper food and make them do sports.

6'4" and my parents ensured i did both of these

shoulders are narrower than i'd like -- however, my face has an awesome jawline and is solid