If you could gain 10kg (25 lbs) on all major lifts for every

Personally id give up 2, i would still be 6 ft and out of manlet range

Zero, I could just buy very cheap steroids widely available

nothing because you can increase weight on your own over time but you can't increase height

File: ReallyMakesMe.png (394KB, 680x680px) Image search: [Google]

394KB, 680x680px

>>41276942
0. This is like asking about giving up IQ for gains, it's never a good idea. I can invest my time and energy and increase my lifts, but I can't increase my height/IQ without extreme measures.

Now if you're at a height where being that tall can be a disadvantage (6'7" +) then I could easily see losing a couple inches for gains. But If you're trying to establish a relationship between the value of height vs value of gains, the answer is height, not because it's necesarilly more valuable to girls, but because it's unchangeable. The stat set in stone always wins.

>>41276942
0 im fucking 5'3

66. I'd be an inch tall (turbo gigga manlet) but I could bench 1855

File: 1477254053929.jpg (726KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

726KB, 2048x1536px

>>41277225
/antmode/

>>41276942

I would lose 50lbs on all of my lifts for 2 inches of height. Seems strange, but I've always wanted to be 6'6". 6'4" is barely above normal tall-guy.

>>41277225
If this somehow translates to leg strength, allowing you to leap huge distances, I'd lose every single inch/fraction of an inch possible until I am only one electron tall. Then, using my godly strength and speed, I cause nuclear fusion between me and other electrons by crashing into them, this allows me to bulk up, and over time, I can regain my original height and more, while retaining godly strength.

Checkmate, OP. This is the only correct answer.

>>41276942
Im 6'2 and my girlfriend is 6'1 I am already walking a fine line.
Zero.